Daniel Thomas‐Rüddel

3.9k citations
31 papers · 1.2k · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Thomas‐Rüddel

29 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Daniel Thomas‐Rüddel
Comparison fields: 5 of 126
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 308
  • Family Practice 41
  • Infectious Diseases 297
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 32
  • Epidemiology 531
Replace Frank Bloos with:
Frank Bloos Germany
Dianne Stephens Australia
Ronan Boulmé France
Adrien Français France
Andrew A. Quartin United States
André Miguel Japiassú Brazil
Álvaro Castellanos-Ortega Spain
Oscar Fernando Pavão dos Santos Brazil
Suzana Margareth Lobo Brazil
Aurélie Cravoisy France
Daniel Thomas‐Rüddel relative to Frank Bloos Germany Frank Bloos's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Frank Bloos · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Thomas‐Rüddel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Thomas‐Rüddel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Thomas‐Rüddel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Thomas‐Rüddel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Thomas‐Rüddel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Thomas‐Rüddel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Thomas‐Rüddel. The network helps show where Daniel Thomas‐Rüddel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Thomas‐Rüddel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Thomas‐Rüddel Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Thomas‐Rüddel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016212
2 2004110
3 202198
4 201696
5 202094
6 201880
7 201670
8 201868
9 202065
10 201459
11 201255
12 201628
13 201921
14 201619
15 201818
16 202117
17 202116
18 201515
19 202113
20 201511

About Daniel Thomas‐Rüddel

Daniel Thomas‐Rüddel is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Emergency Medicine, Infectious Diseases and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 31 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (16 papers), Nosocomial Infections in ICU (4 papers), Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (4 papers), Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing (4 papers), Long-Term Effects of COVID-19 (3 papers), Trauma and Emergency Care Studies (3 papers), Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (3 papers) and Emergency and Acute Care Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (308 citations), Family Practice (41 citations), Infectious Diseases (297 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (32 citations) and Epidemiology (531 citations). Daniel Thomas‐Rüddel has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Christiane S. Hartog, Carolin Fleischmann-Struzek, Frank Bloos, Konrad Reinhart, U. Dennler, Konrad Reinhart, Daniel Schwarzkopf, Michael Bauer, Michael Hartmann and Tobias Welte. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Critical Care, Intensive Care Medicine Experimental, Critical Care, Critical Care Medicine and Intensive Care Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact