Daniel Tchiotsop

1.0k citations
46 papers · 790 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Tchiotsop

44 papers receiving 758 citations

Peers

Daniel Tchiotsop
Comparison fields: 5 of 108
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 317
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 193
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 183
  • Computer Networks and Communications 200
  • Signal Processing 67
Replace Bokai Cao with:
Bokai Cao United States
Minghui Dong Singapore
Nithin Nagaraj India
Gautam Dasarathy United States
Xiaoling Yang China
Akshay Gadde United States
Vasile Manta Romania
Norio Akamatsu Japan
Stergios Papadimitriou Greece
Mikio L. Braun Germany
Daniel Tchiotsop relative to Bokai Cao United States Bokai Cao's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Bokai Cao · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Tchiotsop

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Tchiotsop's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Tchiotsop with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Tchiotsop more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Tchiotsop

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Tchiotsop. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Tchiotsop. The network helps show where Daniel Tchiotsop may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Tchiotsop, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Tchiotsop Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Tchiotsop links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017164
2 2016142
3 202166
4 202147
5 201842
6 202038
7 202123
8 201922
9 202020
10 202119
11 200718
12 201817
13 201816
14 202016
15 201814
16 201912
17 201512
18 202112
19 201511
20 202010

About Daniel Tchiotsop

Daniel Tchiotsop is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Artificial Intelligence, Signal Processing, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 46 papers that have together received 790 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Imaging for Blood Diseases (11 papers), Blind Source Separation Techniques (11 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (10 papers), ECG Monitoring and Analysis (7 papers), Neural Networks and Applications (6 papers), AI in cancer detection (6 papers), COVID-19 diagnosis using AI (5 papers) and Image Processing Techniques and Applications (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (317 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (193 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (183 citations), Computer Networks and Communications (200 citations) and Signal Processing (67 citations). Daniel Tchiotsop has collaborated with scholars based in Cameroon, France and Rwanda. Frequent co-authors include A. Nguomkam Negou, Jacques Kengne, Didier Wolf, Hilaire Bertrand Fotsin, Zeric Tabekoueng Njitacke, Aurelle Tchagna Kouanou, Valérie Louis-Dorr, Michel Noubom, Réné Tchinda and Godpromesse Kenné. Their work appears in journals such as Chaos Solitons & Fractals, Heliyon, Informatics in Medicine Unlocked, Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine and Nonlinear Dynamics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact