Daniel T. McCormick

1.4k citations
43 papers · 1.1k · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel T. McCormick

42 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Daniel T. McCormick
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Biophysics 183
  • Otorhinolaryngology 99
  • Biomedical Engineering 708
  • Ophthalmology 76
  • Instrumentation 30
Replace Hsiang‐Chieh Lee with:
Hsiang‐Chieh Lee United States
Ernest W. Chang United States
Costel Flueraru Canada
Kye‐Sung Lee South Korea
Tom Pfeiffer Germany
George Dobre United Kingdom
Bryden C. Quirk Australia
Desmond C. Adler United States
Yong Huang China
Rodney W. Kirk Australia
Daniel T. McCormick relative to Hsiang‐Chieh Lee United States Hsiang‐Chieh Lee's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×9.9×
Hsiang‐Chieh Lee · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel T. McCormick

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel T. McCormick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel T. McCormick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel T. McCormick more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel T. McCormick

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel T. McCormick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel T. McCormick. The network helps show where Daniel T. McCormick may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel T. McCormick, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel T. McCormick Line = papers co-authored together Daniel T. McCormick links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004166
2 2015111
3 200697
4 200991
5 200573
6 201571
7 201364
8 200458
9 200754
10 201748
11 200531
12 200230
13 200722
14 200319
15 201518
16 200713
17 200313
18 201410
19 200510
20 201410

About Daniel T. McCormick

Daniel T. McCormick is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Biophysics, having authored 43 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Optical Coherence Tomography Applications (16 papers), Advanced MEMS and NEMS Technologies (16 papers), Photoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging (10 papers), Mechanical and Optical Resonators (9 papers), Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques (7 papers), Retinal and Macular Surgery (7 papers), Acoustic Wave Resonator Technologies (7 papers) and Photonic and Optical Devices (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biophysics (183 citations), Otorhinolaryngology (99 citations), Biomedical Engineering (708 citations), Ophthalmology (76 citations) and Instrumentation (30 citations). Daniel T. McCormick has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Korea and Canada. Frequent co-authors include V. Milanović, Woonggyu Jung, Zhongping Chen, N.C. Tien, Norman C. Tien, Stephen A. Boppart, Srinath Satyanarayana, Arun Majumdar, Ryan L. Shelton and Ryan M. Nolan. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Biomedical Optics, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics, Applied Physics Letters, Translational Vision Science & Technology and Optics Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact