Daniel Svenšek

44 papers receiving 666 citations

Peers

Daniel Svenšek
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 383
  • Condensed Matter Physics 132
  • Computer Networks and Communications 182
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 136
  • Mechanical Engineering 149
Replace N. J. Mottram with:
N. J. Mottram United Kingdom
A. P. Krekhov Germany
Oliver Henrich United Kingdom
Joonwoo Jeong South Korea
J. M. Gilli France
Taras Turiv United States
Tadashi Akahane Japan
Daniel A. Beller United States
Jong-Hoon Huh Japan
Oleg Pishnyak United States
Daniel Svenšek relative to N. J. Mottram United Kingdom N. J. Mottram's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
N. J. Mottram · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Svenšek

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Svenšek's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Svenšek with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Svenšek more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Svenšek

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Svenšek. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Svenšek. The network helps show where Daniel Svenšek may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Svenšek, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Svenšek Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Svenšek links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200275
2 200573
3 201241
4 199936
5 201731
6 201829
7 200328
8 200520
9 200820
10 200619
11 201318
12 200418
13 201417
14 201616
15 201816
16 201016
17 201116
18 201616
19 200415
20 200115

About Daniel Svenšek

Daniel Svenšek is a scholar working on Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Biomedical Engineering, Computer Networks and Communications, Condensed Matter Physics and Materials Chemistry, having authored 48 papers that have together received 677 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Liquid Crystal Research Advancements (22 papers), Nonlinear Dynamics and Pattern Formation (13 papers), Characterization and Applications of Magnetic Nanoparticles (7 papers), Micro and Nano Robotics (6 papers), Theoretical and Computational Physics (6 papers), Material Dynamics and Properties (5 papers), Advanced Materials and Mechanics (4 papers) and Plant Reproductive Biology (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (383 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (132 citations), Computer Networks and Communications (182 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (136 citations) and Mechanical Engineering (149 citations). Daniel Svenšek has collaborated with scholars based in Slovenia, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include S. Žumer, Helmut R. Brand, Harald Pleiner, Rudolf Podgornik, Maurizio Nobili, Christophe Blanc, Jernej Polajnar, Andrej Čokl, Natan Osterman and V. Adrian Parsegian. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Letters, Physical review. E, The European Physical Journal E, The Journal of Chemical Physics and Rheologica Acta.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact