Daniel Statman

1.9k citations
73 papers · 950 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Statman

65 papers receiving 815 citations

Peers

Daniel Statman
Comparison fields: 5 of 110
  • Family Practice 83
  • Philosophy 307
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 158
  • Political Science and International Relations 216
  • Sociology and Political Science 273
Replace Steven A. Epstein with:
Steven A. Epstein United States
D. C. Watt United Kingdom
Heiner Fangerau Germany
Stephen J. Morse United States
Elselijn Kingma United Kingdom
R. Persaud United Kingdom
Gerrit Glas Netherlands
Bernard Schıssel Canada
W. W. Meissner United States
George Graham United States
Daniel Statman relative to Steven A. Epstein United States Steven A. Epstein's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11.9×
Steven A. Epstein · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Statman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Statman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Statman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Statman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Statman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Statman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Statman. The network helps show where Daniel Statman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Statman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Statman Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Statman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 73 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008172
2 200069
3 199769
4 198864
5 199144
6 199042
7 200842
8 199242
9 199139
10 200625
11 200323
12 200422
13 199721
14 199517
15 201916
16
Divine Command Morality and Jewish Tradition
199514
17 199314
18 200513
19 199713
20 201112

About Daniel Statman

Daniel Statman is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Philosophy, Political Science and International Relations, Cognitive Neuroscience and Law, having authored 73 papers that have together received 950 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include War, Ethics, and Justification (28 papers), Torture, Ethics, and Law (19 papers), Global Peace and Security Dynamics (13 papers), Free Will and Agency (12 papers), Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies (9 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (6 papers), Religious Freedom and Discrimination (6 papers) and Political Philosophy and Ethics (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (83 citations), Philosophy (307 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (158 citations), Political Science and International Relations (216 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (273 citations). Daniel Statman has collaborated with scholars based in Israel, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Faye S. Silverstein, Michael V. Johnston, Antoinette Schoenthaler, William F. Chaplin, Douglas Berger, Travis D. Richardson, Gbenga Ogedegbe, Erica Phillips, James H. Spencer and John P. Allegrante. Their work appears in journals such as Law and Philosophy, Ratio, Ethics, Journal of Military Ethics and Journal of Applied Philosophy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact