Daniel Starza Smith
Impact in
- Philosophy top 5%
- Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism
- Philosophical and Theoretical Analysis
- Cultural Studies top 5%
- Posthumanist Ethics and Activism
Papers in
-
- Digital Humanities and Scholarship 2
- Historical and Literary Analyses 1
- Classics 2
- Medieval Literature and History 1
- Renaissance Literature and Culture 1
- Co-authors
- David Mills (1 shared paper)Graham Davis (1 shared paper)Martin L. Demaine (1 shared paper)Erik D. Demaine (1 shared paper)Melanie Marshall (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The Review of English Studies (1 paper)Nature Communications (1 paper)Huntington Library Quarterly (1 paper)Edinburgh University Press eBooks (1 paper)London review of books (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Daniel Starza Smith
6 papers receiving 105 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
- Philosophy 46
- Cultural Studies 29
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts 11
- Literature and Literary Theory 23
- Classics 7
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Starza Smith
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Starza Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Starza Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Starza Smith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Starza Smith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Starza Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Starza Smith. The network helps show where Daniel Starza Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 5 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Starza Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2012 | 99 | |
| 2 | 2021 | 12 | |
| 3 | 2016 | 8 | |
| 4 | 2014 | 7 | |
| 5 | In a Different Key: The Story of Autism by John Donvan and Caren Zucker; NeuroTribes by Steve Silberman | 2016 | 1 |
| 6 | Bess of Hardwick's Letters: The Complete Correspondence, c.1550-1608 | 2013 | 1 |
| 7 | 2017 | 0 | |
| 8 | 2016 | 0 | |
| 9 | Desire and Immanence: The Difficulties of Post-Dualist Thought | 2016 | 0 |
About Daniel Starza Smith
Daniel Starza Smith is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Classics, Communication, Anthropology and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, having authored 9 papers that have together received 128 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Humanities and Scholarship (2 papers), Historical Studies of British Isles (1 paper), Medieval Literature and History (1 paper), Image Processing and 3D Reconstruction (1 paper), Historical and Literary Analyses (1 paper), Handwritten Text Recognition Techniques (1 paper), Renaissance Literature and Culture (1 paper) and 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (46 citations), Cultural Studies (29 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (11 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (23 citations) and Classics (7 citations). Daniel Starza Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include David Mills, Graham Davis, Martin L. Demaine, Erik D. Demaine and Melanie Marshall. Their work appears in journals such as The Review of English Studies, Nature Communications, Huntington Library Quarterly, Edinburgh University Press eBooks and London review of books.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.