Daniel Schwartz

42 papers receiving 999 citations

Peers

Daniel Schwartz
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Transplantation 100
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 354
  • Surgery 537
  • Nephrology 56
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 36
Replace Philip I. Hornick with:
Philip I. Hornick United Kingdom
Cristiano Amarelli Italy
Christopher H. Wigfield United States
Stephen T. Bartlett United States
Heinrich Netz Germany
Gideon Sahar Israel
H. G. Borst Germany
Michel Abdelnoor Norway
Pamela A. Marcovitz United States
Ayyaz A. Ali United Kingdom
Daniel Schwartz relative to Philip I. Hornick United Kingdom Philip I. Hornick's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8×9×
Philip I. Hornick · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Schwartz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Schwartz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Schwartz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Schwartz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Schwartz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Schwartz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Schwartz. The network helps show where Daniel Schwartz may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Schwartz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Schwartz Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Schwartz links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1996115
2 1995100
3 199770
4 199858
5 199856
6 200955
7 201548
8 201347
9 199541
10 200840
11 199635
12 200434
13 200633
14 199730
15 199828
16 199528
17 200126
18
The proliferation of elastic fibres after skin incisions in albino mice and rats: a light and electron microscopic study.
197723
19 201223
20 199721

About Daniel Schwartz

Daniel Schwartz is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Rheumatology, Surgery, Emergency Medicine and Emergency Medical Services, having authored 44 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research (6 papers), Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques (5 papers), Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (4 papers), Renal Diseases and Glomerulopathies (3 papers), Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (3 papers), Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments (2 papers), Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (2 papers) and Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Transplantation (100 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (354 citations), Surgery (537 citations), Nephrology (56 citations) and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (36 citations). Daniel Schwartz has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Israel and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Aubrey C. Galloway, Eugene A. Grossi, Stephen B. Colvin, Greg H. Ribakove, F.Gregory Baumann, James E. Barone, Jess D. Schwartz, Frank Cole Spencer, Itzhak Kronzon and James M. Pullman. Their work appears in journals such as The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Prehospital Emergency Care, Journal of Surgical Research and Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact