Daniel Schilter

562 citations
6 papers · 425 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Schilter

6 papers receiving 419 citations

Peers

Daniel Schilter
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Developmental Neuroscience 91
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 196
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 14
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 93
  • Neurology 24
Replace Louise Richards with:
Louise Richards United Kingdom
Evan Z. Goldstein United States
Weimin Dai China
Gaetana Minnone Italy
David G. LeBold United States
Muhammad Zia United States
Ghafar T. Sarvestani Australia
Onat Akyol United States
Michael Sabolek Germany
G. Hanf Germany
Daniel Schilter relative to Louise Richards United Kingdom Louise Richards's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Louise Richards · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Schilter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Schilter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Schilter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Schilter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Schilter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Schilter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Schilter. The network helps show where Daniel Schilter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Schilter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Schilter Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Schilter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

6 of 6 papers shown
#Work
1 1992200
2 199396
3 200856
4 201930
5 201724
6 200719

About Daniel Schilter

Daniel Schilter is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Neurology and Epidemiology, having authored 6 papers that have together received 425 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nerve injury and regeneration (2 papers), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research (2 papers), Macrophage Migration Inhibitory Factor (1 paper), Cardiovascular and exercise physiology (1 paper), Tracheal and airway disorders (1 paper), Nuclear Receptors and Signaling (1 paper), Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (1 paper) and Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (91 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (196 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (14 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (93 citations) and Neurology (24 citations). Daniel Schilter has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, Italy and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include U. Otten, Rita Levi‐Montalcini, Luigi Aloe, Carla Buttinelli, Silke Gillessen, Michael Tamm, Luisa Bracci‐Laudiero, M. Galeazzi, Jackie Leach Scully and Martin Brutsche. Their work appears in journals such as Neuroreport, American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Respiration, European Respiratory Journal and Respirology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact