Daniel Scheidt

561 citations
11 papers · 455 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Scheidt

11 papers receiving 421 citations

Peers

Daniel Scheidt
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 260
  • Pollution 169
  • Environmental Chemistry 77
  • Ecology 183
  • Earth-Surface Processes 24
Replace Asok Kumar Bhattacharya with:
Asok Kumar Bhattacharya Sweden
Peter Kalla United States
René Schwartz Germany
Elisamara Sabadini-Santos Brazil
L. P. Kudryavtseva Russia
Heloísa H. M. Paraquetti Brazil
I. Moreira Brazil
Cássia de Oliveira Farias Brazil
Ian Stupakoff United States
Michael Buchman United States
Daniel Scheidt relative to Asok Kumar Bhattacharya Sweden Asok Kumar Bhattacharya's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Asok Kumar Bhattacharya · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Scheidt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Scheidt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Scheidt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Scheidt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Scheidt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Scheidt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Scheidt. The network helps show where Daniel Scheidt may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Scheidt, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Scheidt Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Scheidt links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 201190
2 200878
3 198966
4 201553
5 198636
6 200834
7 199527
8 200924
9 199524
10 201121
11 20212

About Daniel Scheidt

Daniel Scheidt is a scholar working on Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Pollution, Ecology, Earth-Surface Processes and Oceanography, having authored 11 papers that have together received 455 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mercury impact and mitigation studies (9 papers), Heavy metals in environment (5 papers), Coastal and Marine Dynamics (4 papers), Heavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity (3 papers), Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics (3 papers), Isotope Analysis in Ecology (2 papers), Marine animal studies overview (1 paper) and Geochemistry and Elemental Analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (260 citations), Pollution (169 citations), Environmental Chemistry (77 citations), Ecology (183 citations) and Earth-Surface Processes (24 citations). Daniel Scheidt has collaborated with scholars based in United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Peter Kalla, Yong Cai, Guangliang Liu, Thomas V. Belanger, Leonard J. Scinto, Richard D. Jones, Quentin J. Stober, Jennifer H. Richards, Andrew S. Gordon and William J. Cooper. Their work appears in journals such as Environmental Science & Technology, Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, The Science of The Total Environment, Water Air & Soil Pollution and Environmental Pollution.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact