Daniel Schäfer

51 papers receiving 249 citations

Peers

Daniel Schäfer
Comparison fields: 5 of 134
  • Aging 7
  • Energy Engineering and Power Technology 12
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 18
  • Archeology 4
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 5
Replace Bryson Brown with:
Bryson Brown Canada
Philippe Genestier France
Xun Zhou China
Anthony Gray Australia
Robert Frank United States
Michael Fleischmann Australia
Luís Enrique Cuba
Michael Clark United States
Steffen Ducheyne Belgium
Bent Sørensen Denmark
Daniel Schäfer relative to Bryson Brown Canada Bryson Brown's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Bryson Brown · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Schäfer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Schäfer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Schäfer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Schäfer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Schäfer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Schäfer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Schäfer. The network helps show where Daniel Schäfer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Schäfer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Schäfer Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Schäfer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 68 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200450
2 201128
3 201025
4
Student Solutions Manual for Ramsey/Schafer's The Statistical Sleuth: A Course in Methods of Data Analysis, 3rd
201219
5 200518
6 200411
7 199311
8 201310
9 200210
10 20059
11 20159
12 19997
13 20106
14
Zukunftsvoraussagen in der Renaissance
20055
15 20104
16
Alter und Krankheit in der frühen Neuzeit : der ärztliche Blick auf die letzte Lebensphase
20044
17 20084
18 20113
19 20073
20 19983

About Daniel Schäfer

Daniel Schäfer is a scholar working on History, Sociology and Political Science, Anthropology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 68 papers that have together received 289 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes (5 papers), Colonialism, slavery, and trade (5 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (4 papers), Medical History and Research (3 papers), Color Science and Applications (3 papers), History of Medicine Studies (3 papers), Archaeology and Natural History (3 papers) and Pain Management and Placebo Effect (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Aging (7 citations), Energy Engineering and Power Technology (12 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (18 citations), Archeology (4 citations) and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (5 citations). Daniel Schäfer has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include R. Sabatowski, Fred L. Ramsey, Christian Breyer, Alexander Gerlach, J. Schmid, Birgit Gemeinholzer, Bernhard Seeger, Neela Enke, Jörg Bendix and Kerstin Bach. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, Medical History, The Journal of Southern History, Slavery and Abolition and African Studies Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact