Daniel S. Lukas

1.4k citations
40 papers · 1.0k · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel S. Lukas

39 papers receiving 812 citations

Peers

Daniel S. Lukas
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 395
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 369
  • Epidemiology 303
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 33
  • Surgery 285
Replace Steven M. Yabek with:
Steven M. Yabek United States
Walter T. Goodale United States
D. Vérel United Kingdom
F Loogen Germany
Sanford E. Warren United States
Philip B. Oliva United States
Michael S. Dahn United States
M J Godman United Kingdom
M. V. Inberg Finland
Irving S. Wright United States
Daniel S. Lukas relative to Steven M. Yabek United States Steven M. Yabek's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Steven M. Yabek · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel S. Lukas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel S. Lukas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel S. Lukas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel S. Lukas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel S. Lukas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel S. Lukas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel S. Lukas. The network helps show where Daniel S. Lukas may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel S. Lukas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel S. Lukas Line = papers co-authored together Daniel S. Lukas links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1969105
2 195381
3 195880
4 195574
5 196265
6 195552
7 197151
8 195245
9 196941
10 195236
11 196334
12 195229
13 195128
14 197228
15 195427
16 195726
17 195123
18 195821
19 196221
20 196320

About Daniel S. Lukas

Daniel S. Lukas is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Epidemiology, Surgery and Molecular Biology, having authored 40 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (8 papers), Congenital Heart Disease Studies (6 papers), Pulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments (5 papers), Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments (5 papers), Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management (5 papers), Vascular anomalies and interventions (4 papers), Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (3 papers) and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (395 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (369 citations), Epidemiology (303 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (33 citations) and Surgery (285 citations). Daniel S. Lukas has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Czechia. Frequent co-authors include Israel Steinberg, Mary Allen Engle, Charles T. Dotter, Fred Plum, Thomas Killip, Henry P. Goldberg, Stephen M. Ayres, Frank Glenn, George R. Holswade and Kathryn H. Ehlers. Their work appears in journals such as The American Journal of Medicine, Circulation, Journal of Applied Physiology, New England Journal of Medicine and Journal of Clinical Investigation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact