Daniel S. Keller

31 papers receiving 478 citations

Peers

Daniel S. Keller
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Applied Psychology 49
  • Clinical Psychology 138
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 92
  • Epidemiology 197
  • General Health Professions 126
Replace Miriam Siegler with:
Miriam Siegler United States
Victoria A. Besalel United States
Linda Grossman United States
Guido Crocetti United States
Steven F. Bucky United States
Richard Clements United States
Martin Hildebrand Netherlands
Anke Snoek Netherlands
Jeffrey A. Bernat United States
Stephen J. Lally United States
Daniel S. Keller relative to Miriam Siegler United States Miriam Siegler's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×13×
Miriam Siegler · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel S. Keller

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel S. Keller's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel S. Keller with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel S. Keller more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel S. Keller

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel S. Keller. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel S. Keller. The network helps show where Daniel S. Keller may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Daniel S. Keller, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel S. Keller Line = papers co-authored together Daniel S. Keller links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001144
2 199186
3 200044
4 196041
5 199530
6 200223
7 200317
8 199714
9 199313
10 199913
11 195513
12 201713
13 195911
14 199410
15 202010
16 19959
17 19978
18 19947
19 20027
20 19985

About Daniel S. Keller

Daniel S. Keller is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Clinical Psychology, Literature and Literary Theory and Electrical and Electronic Engineering, having authored 35 papers that have together received 547 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (12 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (8 papers), Electric Motor Design and Analysis (6 papers), Multilevel Inverters and Converters (4 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (4 papers), Spanish Literature and Culture Studies (4 papers), Comparative Literary Analysis and Criticism (3 papers) and Digital Mental Health Interventions (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (49 citations), Clinical Psychology (138 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (92 citations), Epidemiology (197 citations) and General Health Professions (126 citations). Daniel S. Keller has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Kathleen M. Carroll, Helen Dermatis, Barbara S. McCrady, Marc Galanter, Jon Morgenstern, Thomas J. H. Morgan, B Rounsaville, Julio Caro Baroja, Susan Egelko and Charla Nich. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal on Addictions, The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, Substance Abuse, Psychology of Addictive Behaviors and Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact