Daniel S. Chapman

4.8k citations
75 papers · 2.5k · h-index 29

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel S. Chapman

68 papers receiving 2.5k citations

Peers

Daniel S. Chapman
Comparison fields: 5 of 137
  • Ecological Modeling 678
  • Horticulture 82
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 776
  • Ecology 943
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 690
Replace Nicole Estrella with:
Nicole Estrella Germany
Stefan Schindler Austria
Theresa M. Crimmins United States
Stéphanie Aviron France
Nalini M. Nadkarni United States
Amanda D. Rodewald United States
C. E. Timothy Paine United States
Paul Smith United Kingdom
Kenneth J. Feeley United States
Mary E. Blair United States
Daniel S. Chapman relative to Nicole Estrella Germany Nicole Estrella's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11.7×
Nicole Estrella · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel S. Chapman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel S. Chapman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel S. Chapman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel S. Chapman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel S. Chapman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel S. Chapman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel S. Chapman. The network helps show where Daniel S. Chapman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel S. Chapman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel S. Chapman Line = papers co-authored together Daniel S. Chapman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 75 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012202
2 2017195
3 2012137
4 2018120
5 201397
6 201695
7 201493
8 201387
9 200985
10 201970
11 201370
12 201765
13 200965
14 201062
15 201659
16 201753
17 201453
18 201145
19 200944
20 201944

About Daniel S. Chapman

Daniel S. Chapman is a scholar working on Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Ecological Modeling and Plant Science, having authored 75 papers that have together received 2.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (27 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (22 papers), Plant and animal studies (22 papers), Forest Insect Ecology and Management (11 papers), Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (7 papers), Phytoplasmas and Hemiptera pathogens (6 papers), Biological Control of Invasive Species (6 papers) and Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (678 citations), Horticulture (82 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (776 citations), Ecology (943 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (690 citations). Daniel S. Chapman has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include James M. Bullock, Helen E. Roy, Bethan V. Purse, Adam Butler, Kate R. Searle, Andrew Jordan, Peter Simmons, Allan Watt, Juliette Young and Steven M. White. Their work appears in journals such as Global Change Biology, Global Ecology and Biogeography, Functional Ecology, Journal of Biogeography and Landscape Ecology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact