Daniel Rodger
Impact in
- Health Informatics top 5%
- Reproductive Medicine top 10%
- Reproductive Health and Technologies
Papers in
-
- Organ Donation and Transplantation 12
- Reproductive Health and Contraception 6
- Surgery 19
- Xenotransplantation and immune response 17
- Co-authors
- Bruce P. Blackshaw (20 shared papers)Daniel J. Hurst (17 shared papers)Sebastian Porsdam Mann (2 shared papers)Brian D. Earp (2 shared papers)Julian Savulescu (2 shared papers)David K. C. Cooper (4 shared papers)Sven Nyholm (1 shared paper)Hilary Bowman‐Smart (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Medical Ethics (8 papers)Xenotransplantation (7 papers)Bioethics (4 papers)BMC Medical Ethics (3 papers)Evidence-Based Nursing (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Daniel Rodger
50 papers receiving 389 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
- Health Informatics 23
- Reproductive Medicine 73
- Developmental Neuroscience 15
- Transplantation 9
- Safety Research 31
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Rodger
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Rodger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Rodger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Rodger more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Rodger
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Rodger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Rodger. The network helps show where Daniel Rodger may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Rodger, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 55 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2023 | 63 | |
| 2 | 2018 | 21 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 21 | |
| 4 | 2022 | 19 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 19 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 18 | |
| 7 | 2019 | 17 | |
| 8 | 2020 | 14 | |
| 9 | 2018 | 12 | |
| 10 | 2024 | 12 | |
| 11 | 2019 | 12 | |
| 12 | 2018 | 11 | |
| 13 | 2024 | 10 | |
| 14 | 2020 | 10 | |
| 15 | 2020 | 10 | |
| 16 | 2024 | 9 | |
| 17 | 2024 | 9 | |
| 18 | 2023 | 9 | |
| 19 | 2021 | 8 | |
| 20 | 2020 | 8 |
About Daniel Rodger
Daniel Rodger is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Surgery, Reproductive Medicine, Cognitive Neuroscience and General Health Professions, having authored 55 papers that have together received 411 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Xenotransplantation and immune response (17 papers), Organ Donation and Transplantation (12 papers), Reproductive Health and Technologies (11 papers), Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations (7 papers), Reproductive Health and Contraception (6 papers), Ethics in medical practice (5 papers), Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse (5 papers) and Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (23 citations), Reproductive Medicine (73 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (15 citations), Transplantation (9 citations) and Safety Research (31 citations). Daniel Rodger has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Bruce P. Blackshaw, Daniel J. Hurst, Sebastian Porsdam Mann, Brian D. Earp, Julian Savulescu, David K. C. Cooper, Sven Nyholm, Hilary Bowman‐Smart, Joshua Hatherley and John McMillan. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Medical Ethics, Xenotransplantation, Bioethics, BMC Medical Ethics and Evidence-Based Nursing.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.