Daniel Robert Curtis

43 papers receiving 550 citations

Peers

Daniel Robert Curtis
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
  • Economics and Econometrics 160
  • Paleontology 42
  • History and Philosophy of Science 26
  • Demography 52
  • History 49
Replace Lee Mordechai with:
Lee Mordechai United States
Jean-Noël Biraben France
Gary S. Dunbar United States
Matthew Hannaford United Kingdom
Joyce E. Chaplin United States
Matthew Liebmann United States
Lizzie Wade United States
Dan L. Flores United States
John A. Marino United States
Radosław Poniat Poland
Daniel Robert Curtis relative to Lee Mordechai United States Lee Mordechai's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.7×
Lee Mordechai · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Robert Curtis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Robert Curtis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Robert Curtis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Robert Curtis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Robert Curtis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Robert Curtis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Robert Curtis. The network helps show where Daniel Robert Curtis may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Robert Curtis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Robert Curtis Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Robert Curtis links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201943
2 202041
3 201739
4 201638
5 201237
6 201336
7 201735
8 201628
9 201825
10 202025
11 201624
12 201821
13 201619
14 201318
15 201717
16 201517
17 201214
18 201714
19 201412
20 202011

About Daniel Robert Curtis

Daniel Robert Curtis is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, History and Philosophy of Science, History, Genetics and Modeling and Simulation, having authored 44 papers that have together received 609 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Economic and Social Studies (16 papers), Yersinia bacterium, plague, ectoparasites research (8 papers), Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (6 papers), COVID-19 epidemiological studies (3 papers), Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes (3 papers), Vietnamese History and Culture Studies (3 papers), Culture, Economy, and Development Studies (3 papers) and Zoonotic diseases and public health (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Economics and Econometrics (160 citations), Paleontology (42 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (26 citations), Demography (52 citations) and History (49 citations). Daniel Robert Curtis has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Bas van Bavel, Tim Soens, Michèle Campopiano, Matthew Hannaford, Carol Ann Mallory-Smith, Andrew G. Hulting, Joseph T. Dauer, Eric Vanhaute and Ram A. Cnaan. Their work appears in journals such as Emerging infectious diseases, The Economic History Review, Speculum, Historical Research and International Journal of the Commons.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact