Daniel R. Cleary

1.5k citations
38 papers · 916 · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel R. Cleary

37 papers receiving 906 citations

Peers

Daniel R. Cleary
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
  • Aging 58
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 461
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 246
  • Neurology 176
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 70
Replace Vicente Martínez with:
Vicente Martínez United States
Cyril Bories Canada
Napoleon Torrès France
Katherine W. Scangos United States
Shi-Jun Weng China
Ali Mohebi United States
Clemens Neudorfer Germany
Ryo Ikeda Japan
Chi Ren United States
Stephanie L. Alberico United States
Daniel R. Cleary relative to Vicente Martínez United States Vicente Martínez's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Vicente Martínez · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel R. Cleary

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel R. Cleary's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel R. Cleary with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel R. Cleary more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel R. Cleary

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel R. Cleary. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel R. Cleary. The network helps show where Daniel R. Cleary may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel R. Cleary, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel R. Cleary Line = papers co-authored together Daniel R. Cleary links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017107
2 202275
3 200674
4 201571
5 200964
6 201245
7 201043
8 201341
9 202239
10 201335
11 201232
12 201928
13 200725
14 201824
15 201923
16 202120
17 201719
18 201618
19 202118
20 200915

About Daniel R. Cleary

Daniel R. Cleary is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience, Neurology, Physiology and Surgery, having authored 38 papers that have together received 916 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (11 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (9 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (6 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (5 papers), Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (5 papers), Advanced Memory and Neural Computing (4 papers), Sleep and Wakefulness Research (3 papers) and Neurological disorders and treatments (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Aging (58 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (461 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (246 citations), Neurology (176 citations) and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (70 citations). Daniel R. Cleary has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Korea and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Mary M. Heinricher, Ahmed M. Raslan, Shadi A. Dayeh, Kim J. Burchiel, Alp Ozpinar, Andrew L. Ko, Eric Halgren, Justin S. Cetas, Jonathan D. Carlson and Joel R. Martin. Their work appears in journals such as Neurosurgical FOCUS, Neuroscience, Advanced Functional Materials, Journal of Neurophysiology and Science Translational Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact