Daniel Plohmann

509 citations
10 papers · 386 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Plohmann

7 papers receiving 367 citations

Peers

Daniel Plohmann
Comparison fields: 5 of 26
  • Signal Processing 235
  • Computer Networks and Communications 322
  • Information Systems 165
  • Artificial Intelligence 225
  • Software 5
Replace Maryam Feily with:
Maryam Feily Malaysia
Tianning Zang China
Amit Praseed India
Changhoon Yoon South Korea
Amine Boukhtouta Canada
Cynthia Wagner Luxembourg
Domhnall Carlin United Kingdom
Jeman Park United States
Keesook J. Han United States
Daniel Plohmann relative to Maryam Feily Malaysia Maryam Feily's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.3×
Maryam Feily · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Plohmann

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Plohmann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Plohmann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Plohmann more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Plohmann

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Plohmann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Plohmann. The network helps show where Daniel Plohmann may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Plohmann, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Plohmann Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Plohmann links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1
A comprehensive measurement study of domain generating malware
2016142
2 2013125
3 201376
4
Case study of the Miner Botnet
201229
5 201711
6
Patterns of a cooperative malware analysis workflow
20132
7 20241
8
Malware and Botnet Analysis Methodology.
20120
9 20250
10 20240

About Daniel Plohmann

Daniel Plohmann is a scholar working on Signal Processing, Computer Networks and Communications, Information Systems, Artificial Intelligence and Control and Systems Engineering, having authored 10 papers that have together received 386 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Malware Detection Techniques (9 papers), Network Security and Intrusion Detection (7 papers), Digital and Cyber Forensics (3 papers), Software Engineering Research (2 papers), Peer-to-Peer Network Technologies (2 papers), Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications (1 paper), Web Data Mining and Analysis (1 paper) and Spam and Phishing Detection (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Signal Processing (235 citations), Computer Networks and Communications (322 citations), Information Systems (165 citations), Artificial Intelligence (225 citations) and Software (5 citations). Daniel Plohmann has collaborated with scholars based in Germany and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Elmar Gerhards‐Padilla, Brett Stone-Gross, Dennis Andriesse, Herbert Bos, Christian Rossow, Johannes Bader, Michael A. Klatt and Christian Dietrich. Their work appears in journals such as Forensic Science International Digital Investigation, Digital Investigation, Fraunhofer-Publica (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft), Figshare and Publikationsdatenbank der Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact