Daniel Piotto

9.0k citations
36 papers · 867 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Piotto

33 papers receiving 813 citations

Peers

Daniel Piotto
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • Forestry 209
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 546
  • Horticulture 38
  • Global and Planetary Change 422
  • Soil Science 112
Replace Flavio Moreno with:
Flavio Moreno Colombia
Christoph Gehring Brazil
Francisco Mora Mexico
James B. Friday United States
James Grogan United States
Matthew J. Kelty United States
Dethardt Goetze Germany
Tomás A. Easdale New Zealand
Mila Bristow Australia
Humfredo Marcano‐Vega United States
Daniel Piotto relative to Flavio Moreno Colombia Flavio Moreno's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
Flavio Moreno · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Piotto

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Piotto's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Piotto with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Piotto more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Piotto

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Piotto. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Piotto. The network helps show where Daniel Piotto may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Piotto, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Piotto Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Piotto links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008226
2 2004128
3 200384
4 200966
5 200960
6 200352
7 201836
8 201928
9 201823
10 202118
11 200417
12 201615
13 201813
14 201712
15
GROWTH OF NATIVE TREE SPECIES PLANTED IN OPEN PASTURE, YOUNG SECONDARY FOREST AND MATURE FOREST IN HUMID TROPICAL COSTA RICA
200712
16 202112
17 202110
18 20208
19
Comportamiento de las especies y preferencias de los productores. Plantaciones forestales en Costa Rica y Nicaragua
20026
20 20216

About Daniel Piotto

Daniel Piotto is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Global and Planetary Change, Ecology, Forestry and Plant Science, having authored 36 papers that have together received 867 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forest ecology and management (18 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (11 papers), Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (9 papers), Forest Management and Policy (8 papers), Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems (8 papers), Land Use and Ecosystem Services (4 papers), Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (4 papers) and Forest Insect Ecology and Management (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Forestry (209 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (546 citations), Horticulture (38 citations), Global and Planetary Change (422 citations) and Soil Science (112 citations). Daniel Piotto has collaborated with scholars based in Brazil, United States and Costa Rica. Frequent co-authors include Florencia Montagnini, Markku Kanninen, Mark S. Ashton, Dylan Craven, Chadwick Dearing Oliver, William Wayt Thomas, Stephen Porder, Joy B. Winbourne, Meredith G. Hastings and Samir Rolim. Their work appears in journals such as Forest Ecology and Management, Biotropica, Restoration Ecology, Biodiversity and Conservation and Land Use Policy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact