Daniel Phillips

36 papers receiving 614 citations

Peers

Daniel Phillips
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
  • Applied Mathematics 315
  • Mathematical Physics 200
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 363
  • Numerical Analysis 51
  • Condensed Matter Physics 101
Replace Kazuhiro Kurata with:
Kazuhiro Kurata Japan
Lia Bronsard Canada
Stan Alama Canada
Gilles Carbou France
Fang-Hua Lin United States
Marco Marletta United Kingdom
Étienne Sandier France
Reiner Michael Schätzle Germany
Robert L. Jerrard Canada
Daniel Phillips relative to Kazuhiro Kurata Japan Kazuhiro Kurata's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×4.8×
Kazuhiro Kurata · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Phillips

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Phillips's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Phillips with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Phillips more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Phillips

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Phillips. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Phillips. The network helps show where Daniel Phillips may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Phillips, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Phillips Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Phillips links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199885
2 198571
3 199967
4 198465
5
198352
6 195239
7 199135
8 199033
9 198331
10 200230
11 199224
12 199521
13 199321
14 199120
15 195116
16 199415
17 200612
18 200211
19 20149
20 19979

About Daniel Phillips

Daniel Phillips is a scholar working on Applied Mathematics, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Mathematical Physics and Condensed Matter Physics, having authored 39 papers that have together received 714 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Mathematical Modeling in Engineering (10 papers), Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations (10 papers), Liquid Crystal Research Advancements (9 papers), Advanced Mathematical Physics Problems (6 papers), Nonlinear Dynamics and Pattern Formation (6 papers), Advanced Materials and Mechanics (5 papers), Plant Reproductive Biology (4 papers) and Geometric Analysis and Curvature Flows (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Mathematics (315 citations), Mathematical Physics (200 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (363 citations), Numerical Analysis (51 citations) and Condensed Matter Physics (101 citations). Daniel Phillips has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and France. Frequent co-authors include Patricia A. Bauman, Tiziana Giorgi, Michel Langlais, Avner Friedman, Qi Tang, Chun Liu, Maria Carme Calderer, Neil N. Carlson, Louis Rosen and Chao-Nien Chen. Their work appears in journals such as Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis, Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh Section A Mathematics, Communications in Mathematical Physics and Annales de l Institut Henri Poincaré C Analyse Non Linéaire.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact