Daniel Peter Jones

24 papers receiving 706 citations

Peers

Daniel Peter Jones
Comparison fields: 5 of 114
  • Health Informatics 12
  • Oncology 195
  • Biological Psychiatry 10
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 66
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 74
Replace Jinyi Li with:
Jinyi Li China
Andrew H. Tran United States
SungA Bae South Korea
Shin Hye Yoo South Korea
Bilal Ahmad Malik United States
Jee Eun Lee South Korea
Guan Wang China
James M. Roach United States
Daniel Peter Jones relative to Jinyi Li China Jinyi Li's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×
Jinyi Li · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Peter Jones

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Peter Jones's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Peter Jones with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Peter Jones more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Peter Jones

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Peter Jones. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Peter Jones. The network helps show where Daniel Peter Jones may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Peter Jones, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Peter Jones Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Peter Jones links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2020167
2 2005117
3 201656
4 202054
5 201945
6 201741
7 202135
8 200033
9 201825
10 196823
11 201621
12 202019
13 202019
14 200318
15 202114
16 202013
17 202112
18 20199
19 20249
20 19916

About Daniel Peter Jones

Daniel Peter Jones is a scholar working on Nephrology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Oncology and Health Informatics, having authored 27 papers that have together received 747 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include COVID-19 and healthcare impacts (3 papers), American Environmental and Regional History (2 papers), Flowering Plant Growth and Cultivation (2 papers), Canadian Identity and History (2 papers), Acute Kidney Injury Research (2 papers), Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (2 papers), Atherosclerosis and Cardiovascular Diseases (2 papers) and Plant tissue culture and regeneration (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (12 citations), Oncology (195 citations), Biological Psychiatry (10 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (66 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (74 citations). Daniel Peter Jones has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Jyoti Patel, Peter B. Armstrong, Brent H. Tisserat, Sharon J. Rosenzweig-Lipson, James A. Harder, James E. Barrett, Terrance H. Andree, Jerry J. Buccafusco, Bartley G. Hoebel and Matthew D. Womack. Their work appears in journals such as British journal of surgery, Journal of the American Heart Association, The New England Quarterly, Journal of Clinical Oncology and Journal of the Early Republic.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact