Daniel Peña

5.8k citations
163 papers · 3.8k · h-index 32

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Peña

149 papers receiving 3.5k citations

Peers

Daniel Peña
Comparison fields: 5 of 187
  • Statistics and Probability 1.2k
  • Finance 703
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 478
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 429
  • Signal Processing 493
Replace Keith Knight with:
Keith Knight Canada
Qiwei Yao United Kingdom
S. James Press United States
Jan R. Magnus Netherlands
Mia Hubert Belgium
Hrishikesh D. Vinod United States
Rong Chen United States
Howell Tong United Kingdom
Yuhong Yang United States
Peter Hall Australia
Daniel Peña relative to Keith Knight Canada Keith Knight's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×
Keith Knight · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Peña

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Peña's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Peña with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Peña more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Peña

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Peña. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Peña. The network helps show where Daniel Peña may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Peña, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Peña Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Peña links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 163 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1997367
2 1999272
3 2001195
4 2005194
5
Análisis de datos multivariantes
2002166
6 1987156
7 2004103
8 198795
9 200687
10 200281
11 200679
12 200178
13 199573
14 200272
15 199967
16 199064
17 198462
18 200360
19 200956
20 200355

About Daniel Peña

Daniel Peña is a scholar working on Statistics and Probability, Economics and Econometrics, Finance, Management Science and Operations Research and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, having authored 163 papers that have together received 3.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Statistical Methods and Models (58 papers), Statistical Methods and Inference (31 papers), Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling (26 papers), Advanced Statistical Process Monitoring (22 papers), Forecasting Techniques and Applications (20 papers), Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis (19 papers), Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (15 papers) and Time Series Analysis and Forecasting (14 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics and Probability (1.2k citations), Finance (703 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (478 citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (429 citations) and Signal Processing (493 citations). Daniel Peña has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, United States and Argentina. Frequent co-authors include Francisco J. Prieto, Ana Justel, George E. P. Box, Ruben H. Zamar, Vı́ctor J. Yohai, Pilar Poncela, Jorge Caiado, Nuno Crato, Julio Rodríguez and Pedro Galeano. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Statistical Association, Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, Journal of Time Series Analysis, Test and Journal of Business and Economic Statistics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact