Daniel P. Wermeling

55 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Daniel P. Wermeling
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 340
  • Pharmaceutical Science 367
  • Toxicology 61
  • Dermatology 142
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 62
Replace Elliot V. Hersh with:
Elliot V. Hersh United States
Jayne Edwards United Kingdom
Daniel E. Becker United States
John F. Peppin United States
David Wesche United States
Polyxane Mertzanis United States
Karen J. McClellan New Zealand
Gary E. Pakes United States
Najib Babul Canada
Nicolas Simon France
Daniel P. Wermeling relative to Elliot V. Hersh United States Elliot V. Hersh's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.2×
Elliot V. Hersh · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel P. Wermeling

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel P. Wermeling's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel P. Wermeling with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel P. Wermeling more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel P. Wermeling

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel P. Wermeling. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel P. Wermeling. The network helps show where Daniel P. Wermeling may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel P. Wermeling, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel P. Wermeling Line = papers co-authored together Daniel P. Wermeling links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 56 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008234
2 2015126
3 199594
4 201492
5 200188
6 200586
7 200973
8 200367
9 201464
10 201257
11 200651
12 199848
13 199539
14 200339
15 200834
16 200834
17 200332
18 200627
19 198725
20 201024

About Daniel P. Wermeling

Daniel P. Wermeling is a scholar working on Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Pharmacology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Physiology and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 56 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pain Management and Opioid Use (13 papers), Epilepsy research and treatment (7 papers), Respiratory and Cough-Related Research (7 papers), Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (6 papers), Anesthesia and Pain Management (6 papers), Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (6 papers), Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (5 papers) and Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (340 citations), Pharmaceutical Science (367 citations), Toxicology (61 citations), Dermatology (142 citations) and Geriatrics and Gerontology (62 citations). Daniel P. Wermeling has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Anita Rudy, Sanford M. Archer, Abby M. Bailey, Audra L. Stinchcomb, Stan L. Banks, Harvinder Singh Gill, Mark R. Prausnitz, Jyoti Gupta, Amanda Robinson and Jodi L. Miller. Their work appears in journals such as Pharmacotherapy The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy, The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, Anesthesia & Analgesia and Annals of Pharmacotherapy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact