Daniel P. Strange

455 citations
8 papers · 344 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel P. Strange

8 papers receiving 338 citations

Peers

Daniel P. Strange
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Infectious Diseases 200
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 197
  • Reproductive Medicine 51
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 35
  • Modeling and Simulation 17
Replace Wangheng Hou with:
Wangheng Hou China
Diana Wong Australia
Shangmei Hou Canada
Claudia Raja Gabaglia United States
Jeremy J. Bearss United States
Helena Russell United States
Shahrokh Paktinat Iran
Taweewun Hunsawong Thailand
Tammy M. Rechtin United States
M.N. Brackin United States
Daniel P. Strange relative to Wangheng Hou China Wangheng Hou's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10.2×
Wangheng Hou · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel P. Strange

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel P. Strange's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel P. Strange with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel P. Strange more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel P. Strange

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel P. Strange. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel P. Strange. The network helps show where Daniel P. Strange may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Daniel P. Strange, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel P. Strange Line = papers co-authored together Daniel P. Strange links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
#Work
1 2017109
2 201980
3 201854
4 201742
5 201831
6 202313
7 20238
8 20217

About Daniel P. Strange

Daniel P. Strange is a scholar working on Infectious Diseases, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Virology and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 8 papers that have together received 344 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Viral Infections and Vectors (6 papers), Mosquito-borne diseases and control (6 papers), COVID-19 Impact on Reproduction (3 papers), Viral Infections and Outbreaks Research (2 papers), Hepatitis B Virus Studies (1 paper), HIV Research and Treatment (1 paper), Malaria Research and Control (1 paper) and SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Infectious Diseases (200 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (197 citations), Reproductive Medicine (51 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (35 citations) and Modeling and Simulation (17 citations). Daniel P. Strange has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Egypt. Frequent co-authors include Saguna Verma, Pei‐Yong Shi, Dietmar W. Siemann, Hooman Sadri‐Ardekani, Nima Pourhabibi Zarandi, Xuping Xie, Teri Ann S. Wong, Axel T. Lehrer, Chih-Yun Lai and Michael Gale. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Microbiology, PLoS Pathogens, Scientific Reports, mBio and Journal of Virology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact