Daniel P. Heruth

1.4k citations
57 papers · 1.1k · h-index 21

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel P. Heruth

56 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Daniel P. Heruth
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 98
  • Physiology 42
  • Molecular Biology 517
  • Nephrology 44
  • Genetics 63
Replace Ruijie Liu with:
Ruijie Liu Australia
Qing Cao China
Kristof Kersse Belgium
Duen-Yi Huang Taiwan
Wei Mu China
Rui Yao China
Victoria Klepsch Austria
Hélène Berger France
Daniel P. Heruth relative to Ruijie Liu Australia Ruijie Liu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
Ruijie Liu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel P. Heruth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel P. Heruth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel P. Heruth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel P. Heruth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel P. Heruth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel P. Heruth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel P. Heruth. The network helps show where Daniel P. Heruth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel P. Heruth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel P. Heruth Line = papers co-authored together Daniel P. Heruth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 57 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011102
2 199382
3 201758
4 201754
5 201545
6 201544
7 201242
8 199241
9 201239
10 199438
11 201538
12 201036
13 201734
14 199730
15 201730
16 199427
17 198625
18 201424
19 202022
20 201322

About Daniel P. Heruth

Daniel P. Heruth is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Oncology, Physiology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Epidemiology, having authored 57 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include PARP inhibition in cancer therapy (5 papers), Protist diversity and phylogeny (5 papers), Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (5 papers), Sirtuins and Resveratrol in Medicine (4 papers), Microtubule and mitosis dynamics (3 papers), Adipose Tissue and Metabolism (3 papers), Hemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders (3 papers) and Erythrocyte Function and Pathophysiology (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (98 citations), Physiology (42 citations), Molecular Biology (517 citations), Nephrology (44 citations) and Genetics (63 citations). Daniel P. Heruth has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Shui Qing Ye, Li Qin Zhang, Paul G. Rothberg, Dmitry N. Grigoryev, Li Q. Zhang, J. F. N. Bradley, Gerald Zirnstein, Martin A. Gorovsky, Sean M. Riordan and Margaret Gibson. Their work appears in journals such as Cell & Bioscience, Scientific Reports, Archives of Oral Biology, Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics and Molecular and Cellular Biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact