Daniel Neu

1.5k citations
48 papers · 1.1k · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Neu

44 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Daniel Neu
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 437
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 110
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 237
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 275
  • Complementary and Manual Therapy 24
Replace Oscar Carrillo with:
Oscar Carrillo United States
Sharon Keenan United States
Fuat Özgen Türkiye
Bart H. W. Te Lindert Netherlands
Eric Lainey France
Douglas B. Kirsch United States
Elie Matar Australia
Francesco Rundo Italy
Alberto Raggi Italy
Holger Lüdtke Germany
Daniel Neu relative to Oscar Carrillo United States Oscar Carrillo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×20×24×
Oscar Carrillo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Neu

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Neu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Neu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Neu more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Neu

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Neu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Neu. The network helps show where Daniel Neu may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Neu, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Neu Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Neu links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012189
2 2018126
3 200899
4 201157
5 201454
6 201050
7 200747
8
Clinical complaints of daytime sleepiness and fatigue: how to distinguish and treat them, especially when they become 'excessive' or 'chronic'?
201041
9 200836
10 201835
11 201528
12 200926
13 201225
14 201324
15 201724
16 201422
17 201522
18 201822
19 201821
20 201319

About Daniel Neu

Daniel Neu is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Cognitive Neuroscience, Physiology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 48 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sleep and related disorders (18 papers), Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research (15 papers), Sleep and Wakefulness Research (15 papers), Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue (8 papers), Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research (5 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (3 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (2 papers) and Restless Legs Syndrome Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (437 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (110 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (237 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (275 citations) and Complementary and Manual Therapy (24 citations). Daniel Neu has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, United States and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Olivier Maîresse, Paul Verbanck, Olivier Le Bon, Paul Linkowski, Peter Weißgerber, Stephan Diehl, Guy Hoffmann, Philippe Peigneux, Lieven Danneels and Dorien Goubert. Their work appears in journals such as Psychiatry Research, Sleep Medicine, SLEEP, Journal of Sleep Research and European Neuropsychopharmacology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact