Daniel Moriarty

969 citations
56 papers · 783 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Moriarty

54 papers receiving 751 citations

Peers

Daniel Moriarty
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 708
  • Aerospace Engineering 165
  • Geophysics 81
  • Atmospheric Science 105
  • Ecology 78
Replace Shinsuke Kodama with:
Shinsuke Kodama Japan
Jesper Henneke United States
Sanna Holm‐Alwmark United States
Kathryn L. Bryson United States
Steven Sholes United States
Juergen Oberst United States
Tabb C. Prissel United States
Lauren M. Jozwiak United States
Carolyn A. Crow United States
Andreas Reufer Switzerland
Daniel Moriarty relative to Shinsuke Kodama Japan Shinsuke Kodama's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×
Shinsuke Kodama · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Moriarty

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Moriarty's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Moriarty with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Moriarty more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Moriarty

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Moriarty. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Moriarty. The network helps show where Daniel Moriarty may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Moriarty, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Moriarty Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Moriarty links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 56 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018144
2 202080
3 201479
4 202152
5 201645
6 201340
7 201535
8 201135
9 201633
10 202221
11 202120
12 201920
13 202416
14 202416
15 202213
16
Atypical Regolith Processes Hold the Key to Enigmatic Lunar Swirls
201413
17 202411
18 20219
19
Compositional Evolution of the Early Lunar Crust: Observed Diverse Mineralogy of the Upper and Lower Crust
20139
20 20227

About Daniel Moriarty

Daniel Moriarty is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Aerospace Engineering, Geophysics, Geology and Atmospheric Science, having authored 56 papers that have together received 783 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Planetary Science and Exploration (46 papers), Astro and Planetary Science (42 papers), Space Exploration and Technology (23 papers), Geological and Geochemical Analysis (8 papers), Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life (7 papers), Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (5 papers), Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping (4 papers) and earthquake and tectonic studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (708 citations), Aerospace Engineering (165 citations), Geophysics (81 citations), Atmospheric Science (105 citations) and Ecology (78 citations). Daniel Moriarty has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Carle M. Pieters, Noah Petro, Nick Dygert, P. Isaacson, Ryan Watkins, Leah C. Cheek, J. D. Kendall, Kerri Donaldson Hanna, Alexander J. Evans and Tabb C. Prissel. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Geophysical Research Planets, The Planetary Science Journal, Space Science Reviews, Icarus and Geophysical Research Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact