Daniel Moock
Impact in
- Process Chemistry and Technology top 10%
- Carbon dioxide utilization in catalysis
- Inorganic Chemistry top 10%
- Asymmetric Hydrogenation and Catalysis
Papers in
-
- Catalytic Cross-Coupling Reactions 7
- N-Heterocyclic Carbenes in Organic and Inorganic Chemistry 5
- Catalytic C–H Functionalization Methods 4
- Cyclopropane Reaction Mechanisms 3
- Organoboron and organosilicon chemistry 3
- Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods 2
- Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis 2
-
- Asymmetric Hydrogenation and Catalysis 5
- Co-authors
- Frank Glorius (9 shared papers)Marco Wollenburg (2 shared papers)Tianjiao Hu (2 shared papers)Tobias Wagener (2 shared papers)Timothy Gallagher (2 shared papers)Christoph Schneider (2 shared papers)Alexander Timmer (3 shared papers)Matthias Freitag (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Angewandte Chemie International Edition (4 papers)Chemical Science (2 papers)Synthesis (1 paper)ACS Catalysis (1 paper)Angewandte Chemie (4 papers)
In The Last Decade
Daniel Moock
12 papers receiving 351 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 28
- Process Chemistry and Technology 44
- Inorganic Chemistry 189
- Organic Chemistry 298
- Pharmaceutical Science 15
- Catalysis 17
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Moock
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Moock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Moock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Moock more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Moock
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Moock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Moock. The network helps show where Daniel Moock may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Moock, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2018 | 62 | |
| 2 | 2021 | 58 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 54 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 51 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 44 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 19 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 18 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 16 | |
| 9 | 2018 | 13 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 11 | |
| 11 | 2020 | 10 | |
| 12 | 2017 | 3 |
About Daniel Moock
Daniel Moock is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Inorganic Chemistry, Process Chemistry and Technology, Biomedical Engineering and Infectious Diseases, having authored 12 papers that have together received 359 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Catalytic Cross-Coupling Reactions (7 papers), Asymmetric Hydrogenation and Catalysis (5 papers), N-Heterocyclic Carbenes in Organic and Inorganic Chemistry (5 papers), Catalytic C–H Functionalization Methods (4 papers), Cyclopropane Reaction Mechanisms (3 papers), Organoboron and organosilicon chemistry (3 papers), Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods (2 papers) and Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Process Chemistry and Technology (44 citations), Inorganic Chemistry (189 citations), Organic Chemistry (298 citations), Pharmaceutical Science (15 citations) and Catalysis (17 citations). Daniel Moock has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Hungary and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Frank Glorius, Marco Wollenburg, Tianjiao Hu, Tobias Wagener, Timothy Gallagher, Christoph Schneider, Alexander Timmer, Matthias Freitag, Mario P. Wiesenfeldt and Jacob Schneidewind. Their work appears in journals such as Angewandte Chemie International Edition, Chemical Science, Synthesis, ACS Catalysis and Angewandte Chemie.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.