Daniel Mines

34 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Daniel Mines
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
  • Transplantation 21
  • Rheumatology 114
  • Surgery 240
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 79
  • Hematology 59
Replace Rajiv Sinha with:
Rajiv Sinha India
David Collister Canada
Manisha Sahay India
Ralf Westerhuis Netherlands
Jian Ying United States
Josipa Radić Croatia
Silvia Lai Italy
Seth I. Sokol United States
Serhan Tuğlular Türkiye
Ashutosh Gupta India
Daniel Mines relative to Rajiv Sinha India Rajiv Sinha's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.0×
Rajiv Sinha · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Mines

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Mines's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Mines with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Mines more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Mines

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Mines. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Mines. The network helps show where Daniel Mines may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Mines, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Mines Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Mines links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008123
2 200681
3 200864
4 201464
5 201256
6 201555
7 201751
8 201050
9 201447
10 201244
11 199342
12 199739
13 201037
14 201437
15 201635
16 200534
17 199733
18 199425
19 201424
20 200820

About Daniel Mines

Daniel Mines is a scholar working on Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Rheumatology, Clinical Psychology and Physiology, having authored 34 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization (2 papers), Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (2 papers), Breast Implant and Reconstruction (2 papers), Respiratory and Cough-Related Research (2 papers), Pneumothorax, Barotrauma, Emphysema (1 paper), Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (1 paper), Gout, Hyperuricemia, Uric Acid (1 paper) and Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Transplantation (21 citations), Rheumatology (114 citations), Surgery (240 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (79 citations) and Hematology (59 citations). Daniel Mines has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Katelin B. Nickel, Margaret A. Olsen, Anna Wallace, Victoria J. Fraser, Stephanie Abbühl, Sarah A. Stahmer, Alex J. Sutton, David K. Warren, Fiona C Warren and E. L. Matteson. Their work appears in journals such as Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, The American Journal of Emergency Medicine, Emergency Medicine Clinics of North America and Annals of Emergency Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact