Daniel McDermott

13 papers receiving 883 citations

Peers

Daniel McDermott
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
  • Surfaces, Coatings and Films 103
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 128
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 389
  • Organic Chemistry 278
  • Molecular Biology 467
Replace M. C. Gerstenberg with:
M. C. Gerstenberg Denmark
Ellen J. Robertson United States
Monique Dubois France
Jennifer E. Laaser United States
J.M. Bloch United States
Pradip Kumar Ghorai India
Andreas Serr Germany
Cathryn L. McFearin United States
T. Solomun Germany
J. Combet France
Daniel McDermott relative to M. C. Gerstenberg Denmark M. C. Gerstenberg's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
M. C. Gerstenberg · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel McDermott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel McDermott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel McDermott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel McDermott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel McDermott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel McDermott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel McDermott. The network helps show where Daniel McDermott may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Daniel McDermott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel McDermott Line = papers co-authored together Daniel McDermott links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 1991458
2 1992108
3 199499
4 199695
5 199343
6 201926
7 202023
8 198922
9 199121
10 200812
11 200411
12 202011
13 20018
14
The Padilla Wrecking Ball: Advocating for Change in Post- Padilla Jurisprudence to Address What Really Ails the Immigration System’s Treatment of Noncitizen Defendants in the Post-Conviction Context
20130

About Daniel McDermott

Daniel McDermott is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Political Science and International Relations, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, General Health Professions and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 14 papers that have together received 937 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (4 papers), Political Philosophy and Ethics (3 papers), Electrostatics and Colloid Interactions (3 papers), Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics (2 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (1 paper), Torture, Ethics, and Law (1 paper), Free Will and Agency (1 paper) and Primary Care and Health Outcomes (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Surfaces, Coatings and Films (103 citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (128 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (389 citations), Organic Chemistry (278 citations) and Molecular Biology (467 citations). Daniel McDermott has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Adrian R. Rennie, Robert K. Thomas, T. M. Bayerl, Gerhard Adam, E. Sackmann, Sean Johnson, J. R. Lu, R. K. Thomas, Patrick Gallagher and Sushil K. Satija. Their work appears in journals such as Langmuir, Chemical Physics, Health Affairs, Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities and Political Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact