Daniel Mark Baker

623 citations
27 papers · 344 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Mark Baker

24 papers receiving 328 citations

Peers

Daniel Mark Baker
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Surgery 109
  • General Health Professions 47
  • Genetics 49
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 37
  • Oncology 41
Replace Matthew A. Pappas with:
Matthew A. Pappas United States
Sarah E. Sasor United States
Martin Situma Uganda
Mohamed Moftah Ireland
Amer H. Nassar United States
Milind Chitnis South Africa
Serena V. Martin United Kingdom
Sylvia Stoianova United Kingdom
Esther Platt United Kingdom
Jeong Ha Wie South Korea
Daniel Mark Baker relative to Matthew A. Pappas United States Matthew A. Pappas's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.4×
Matthew A. Pappas · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Mark Baker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Mark Baker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Mark Baker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Mark Baker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Mark Baker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Mark Baker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Mark Baker. The network helps show where Daniel Mark Baker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Mark Baker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Mark Baker Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Mark Baker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201945
2 202043
3 202126
4 202226
5 202224
6 201723
7 202423
8 202020
9 201715
10 202115
11 201913
12 201712
13 201810
14 20178
15 20178
16 20207
17 20196
18 20246
19 20254
20 20254

About Daniel Mark Baker

Daniel Mark Baker is a scholar working on Surgery, General Health Professions, Genetics, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, having authored 27 papers that have together received 344 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health Literacy and Information Accessibility (5 papers), Inflammatory Bowel Disease (3 papers), Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (3 papers), Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes (2 papers), COVID-19 and healthcare impacts (2 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (2 papers), COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies (1 paper) and Airway Management and Intubation Techniques (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Surgery (109 citations), General Health Professions (47 citations), Genetics (49 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (37 citations) and Oncology (41 citations). Daniel Mark Baker has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and France. Frequent co-authors include Matthew J. Lee, Steven Ross Brown, Georgina Louise Jones, Alan Lobo, G Fowler, Emily G. Heywood, Nigel J P Beasley, A J Lobo, Adam Peckham-Cooper and Kerry H. Robinson. Their work appears in journals such as Colorectal Disease, British journal of surgery, Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, Techniques in Coloproctology and BMJ Open.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact