Daniel Mamah

2.7k citations
60 papers · 1.8k · h-index 25

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Mamah

56 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers

Daniel Mamah
Comparison fields: 5 of 108
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 588
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 570
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 413
  • Biological Psychiatry 38
  • Neurology 86
Replace Dongmei An with:
Dongmei An China
Xiaobo Li United States
Toshiyuki Ohtani Japan
Takuji Hayashi Japan
Nicholas Cooper Australia
Hideyuki Inoue Japan
Qing Lü China
Xinyu Hu China
Deborah Janowitz Germany
Chao Zhang China
Daniel Mamah relative to Dongmei An China Dongmei An's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Dongmei An · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Mamah

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Mamah's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Mamah with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Mamah more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Mamah

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Mamah. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Mamah. The network helps show where Daniel Mamah may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Mamah, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Mamah Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Mamah links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 60 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010155
2 2002139
3 2002132
4 2006113
5 2013112
6 200786
7 200874
8 200862
9 201354
10 201452
11 201651
12 201046
13 201244
14 201242
15 201739
16 201538
17 201838
18 200337
19 200837
20 201430

About Daniel Mamah

Daniel Mamah is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Cognitive Neuroscience, Clinical Psychology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Molecular Biology, having authored 60 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (20 papers), Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (11 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (11 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (6 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (4 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (4 papers), Ion Transport and Channel Regulation (3 papers) and Gastrointestinal motility and disorders (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (588 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (570 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (413 citations), Biological Psychiatry (38 citations) and Neurology (86 citations). Daniel Mamah has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Kenya and Pakistan. Frequent co-authors include Deanna M. Barch, John G. Csernansky, Lei Wang, Michael P. Harms, Victoria Mutiso, David M. Ndetei, Mokhtar H. Gado, Grega Repovš, Matthew J. Smith and Gabriel A. de Erausquin. Their work appears in journals such as Schizophrenia Research, Frontiers in Psychiatry, Comprehensive Psychiatry, Journal of Affective Disorders and Psychiatry Research Neuroimaging.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact