Daniel M. Goldstein

2.9k citations
38 papers · 1.3k · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel M. Goldstein

35 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Daniel M. Goldstein
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Anthropology 217
  • Political Science and International Relations 469
  • Sociology and Political Science 842
  • Urban Studies 81
  • Gender Studies 87
Replace Julian Go with:
Julian Go United States
Derek Sayer Canada
Luis Roniger United States
Gershon Shafir United States
Finn Stepputat Denmark
Lisa Wedeen United States
Philip Abrams United Kingdom
Philip Corrigan United Kingdom
Alex Jeffrey United Kingdom
Michel Wieviorka France
Daniel M. Goldstein relative to Julian Go United States Julian Go's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Julian Go · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel M. Goldstein

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel M. Goldstein's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel M. Goldstein with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel M. Goldstein more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel M. Goldstein

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel M. Goldstein. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel M. Goldstein. The network helps show where Daniel M. Goldstein may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel M. Goldstein, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel M. Goldstein Line = papers co-authored together Daniel M. Goldstein links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007221
2 2010149
3 2004138
4 2008111
5 2003101
6 201277
7 201269
8 200556
9 201639
10 201235
11 201630
12 202023
13 202018
14 200617
15 201016
16 201916
17 199816
18 201715
19 200713
20 201610

About Daniel M. Goldstein

Daniel M. Goldstein is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Anthropology, Economics and Econometrics and Gender Studies, having authored 38 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Politics and Society in Latin America (8 papers), Anthropological Studies and Insights (6 papers), Global Security and Public Health (6 papers), Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance (4 papers), Sex work and related issues (3 papers), Anthropology: Ethics, History, Culture (3 papers), Philippine History and Culture (3 papers) and Migration, Refugees, and Integration (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (217 citations), Political Science and International Relations (469 citations), Sociology and Political Science (842 citations), Urban Studies (81 citations) and Gender Studies (87 citations). Daniel M. Goldstein has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Mark Goodale, John G. Dale, Kay B. Warren, Shannon Speed, Sally Engle Merry, Laura Nader, Sari Wastell, Balakrishnan Rajagopal, Lauren Leve and Richard Ashby Wilson. Their work appears in journals such as PoLAR Political and Legal Anthropology Review, City & Society, American Ethnologist, Cultural Dynamics and Current Anthropology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact