Daniel M. Goldstein

3.2k citations
39 papers · 1.4k · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel M. Goldstein

36 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Daniel M. Goldstein
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
  • Anthropology 231
  • Political Science and International Relations 530
  • Sociology and Political Science 977
  • Urban Studies 86
  • Gender Studies 93
Replace Julian Go with:
Julian Go United States
Derek Sayer Canada
Luis Roniger United States
Finn Stepputat Denmark
José Casanova United States
Philip Abrams United Kingdom
Thomas Blom Hansen United States
Lisa Wedeen United States
Chris Rumford United Kingdom
Janet Roitman United States
Daniel M. Goldstein relative to Julian Go United States Julian Go's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Julian Go · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel M. Goldstein

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel M. Goldstein's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel M. Goldstein with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel M. Goldstein more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel M. Goldstein

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel M. Goldstein. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel M. Goldstein. The network helps show where Daniel M. Goldstein may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel M. Goldstein, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel M. Goldstein Line = papers co-authored together Daniel M. Goldstein links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007218
2 2010176
3 2010149
4 2004138
5 2008110
6 2003101
7 201277
8 201269
9 200557
10 201637
11 201235
12 201630
13 202023
14 202017
15 200617
16 201916
17 201016
18 199816
19 201714
20 200713

About Daniel M. Goldstein

Daniel M. Goldstein is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Anthropology, Economics and Econometrics and Gender Studies, having authored 39 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Politics and Society in Latin America (8 papers), Anthropological Studies and Insights (6 papers), Global Security and Public Health (6 papers), Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance (5 papers), Sex work and related issues (3 papers), Anthropology: Ethics, History, Culture (3 papers), Philippine History and Culture (3 papers) and Migration, Refugees, and Integration (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (231 citations), Political Science and International Relations (530 citations), Sociology and Political Science (977 citations), Urban Studies (86 citations) and Gender Studies (93 citations). Daniel M. Goldstein has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Jean E. Jackson, Shannon Speed, Richard Ashby Wilson, Sari Wastell, Mark Goodale, Sally Engle Merry, Laura Nader, John G. Dale, Kay B. Warren and Lauren Leve. Their work appears in journals such as PoLAR Political and Legal Anthropology Review, City & Society, Anthropological Quarterly, Ethnology and Current Anthropology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact