Daniel Lois
Impact in
- Demography top 2%
- Family Dynamics and Relationships
- Gender Studies top 10%
- Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
- Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences
- Gender and Feminist Studies
Papers in
- Demography 33
- Family Dynamics and Relationships 32
-
- Statistical Methods and Applications 9
- Statistics Education and Methodologies 3
- Co-authors
- Oliver Arránz Becker (19 shared papers)Johannes Florian Kopp (7 shared papers)Bernhard Nauck (3 shared papers)Johannes Kopp (8 shared papers)Anja Steinbach (1 shared paper)
In The Last Decade
Daniel Lois
44 papers receiving 291 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
- Demography 203
- Gender Studies 40
- Sociology and Political Science 81
- Health 13
- Social Psychology 26
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Lois
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Lois's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Lois with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Lois more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Lois
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Lois. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Lois. The network helps show where Daniel Lois may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 5 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Lois, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 54 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2013 | 39 | |
| 2 | 2010 | 29 | |
| 3 | 2010 | 21 | |
| 4 | 2010 | 19 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 19 | |
| 6 | 2016 | 17 | |
| 7 | 2011 | 14 | |
| 8 | 2012 | 14 | |
| 9 | 2010 | 12 | |
| 10 | 2011 | 12 | |
| 11 | 2009 | 11 | |
| 12 | 2012 | 11 | |
| 13 | 2010 | 10 | |
| 14 | 2014 | 10 | |
| 15 | 2012 | 9 | |
| 16 | 2012 | 8 | |
| 17 | 2008 | 7 | |
| 18 | 2013 | 7 | |
| 19 | 2013 | 7 | |
| 20 | 2010 | 6 |
About Daniel Lois
Daniel Lois is a scholar working on Demography, Statistics and Probability, Health, Sociology and Political Science and Management Science and Operations Research, having authored 54 papers that have together received 340 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Family Dynamics and Relationships (32 papers), Statistical Methods and Applications (9 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (7 papers), Diverse Academic Research Areas (6 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (3 papers), Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (3 papers), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (3 papers) and Statistics Education and Methodologies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Demography (203 citations), Gender Studies (40 citations), Sociology and Political Science (81 citations), Health (13 citations) and Social Psychology (26 citations). Daniel Lois has collaborated with scholars based in Germany and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Oliver Arránz Becker, Johannes Florian Kopp, Bernhard Nauck, Johannes Kopp and Anja Steinbach. Their work appears in journals such as KZfSS Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, Demographic Research, Journal of Family Issues, Advances in Life Course Research and Journal of Marriage and the Family.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.