Daniel L. Chase

1.4k citations
15 papers · 1.0k · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel L. Chase

14 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Daniel L. Chase
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
  • Aging 722
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 471
  • Biological Psychiatry 35
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 217
  • Sensory Systems 27
Replace Curtis M. Loer with:
Curtis M. Loer United States
Vera Hapiak United States
Masahiro Tomioka Japan
Robyn Lints United States
Marina Ezcurra United Kingdom
Carol Trent United States
Andrew C. Giles United States
William C. Spencer United States
Gareth Harris United States
Candida Rogers United Kingdom
Daniel L. Chase relative to Curtis M. Loer United States Curtis M. Loer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Curtis M. Loer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel L. Chase

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel L. Chase's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel L. Chase with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel L. Chase more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel L. Chase

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel L. Chase. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel L. Chase. The network helps show where Daniel L. Chase may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Daniel L. Chase, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel L. Chase Line = papers co-authored together Daniel L. Chase links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 2007253
2 2004242
3 201695
4
Biogenic amine neurotransmitters in C.
200790
5 200072
6 200169
7 200651
8 201147
9 200947
10 200431
11 201215
12 20135
13 20134
14 20143
15
Middle School Students' Perceptions of Active Homework
20071

About Daniel L. Chase

Daniel L. Chase is a scholar working on Aging, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, Molecular Biology, Social Psychology and Ecology, having authored 15 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms (11 papers), Circadian rhythm and melatonin (9 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (3 papers), Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact (2 papers), Diverse Education Studies and Reforms (1 paper), Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (1 paper), Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (1 paper) and Outdoor and Experiential Education (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Aging (722 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (471 citations), Biological Psychiatry (35 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (217 citations) and Sensory Systems (27 citations). Daniel L. Chase has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Michael R. Koelle, Georgia A. Patikoglou, Meng‐Qiu Dong, Lisa M. Coughlin, Antony M Jose, D. Ghosh, Khursheed A. Wani, Li Yan McCurdy, Netta Cohen and Michael N. Nitabach. Their work appears in journals such as Genetics, Journal of Visualized Experiments, Current Biology, Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport and Genes & Development.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact