Daniel J. Smith

536 citations
56 papers · 264 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel J. Smith

44 papers receiving 241 citations

Peers

Daniel J. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 75
  • Finance 50
  • Economics and Econometrics 126
  • Sociology and Political Science 97
  • Development 6
Replace Mark Spoerer with:
Mark Spoerer Germany
Bernard Walters United Kingdom
Derek Blades France
Marjan Petreski North Macedonia
Anthony Patrick O’Brien United States
Erik Maarten Bosker Netherlands
Ugo Marani Italy
Eric Hilt United States
Marc Tomljanovich United States
Bryce Wilkinson United States
Daniel J. Smith relative to Mark Spoerer Germany Mark Spoerer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Mark Spoerer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel J. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel J. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel J. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel J. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel J. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel J. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel J. Smith. The network helps show where Daniel J. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside Daniel J. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel J. Smith Line = papers co-authored together Daniel J. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 56 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201226
2 201325
3 202123
4 201217
5 201214
6 201613
7 201111
8
The Evolution of Economics: Where We are and How We Got Here
20089
9 20148
10 20158
11 20237
12 20187
13 20217
14 20187
15 20176
16 20206
17 20125
18 20245
19 20205
20 20104

About Daniel J. Smith

Daniel J. Smith is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Finance and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 56 papers that have together received 264 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Economic Theory and Institutions (16 papers), Economic Theory and Policy (10 papers), Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (10 papers), Political Economy and Marxism (8 papers), Global Financial Crisis and Policies (7 papers), Housing Market and Economics (5 papers), Culture, Economy, and Development Studies (5 papers) and Fiscal Policies and Political Economy (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (75 citations), Finance (50 citations), Economics and Econometrics (126 citations), Sociology and Political Science (97 citations) and Development (6 citations). Daniel J. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Peter J. Boettke, Daniel Sutter, Alexander William Salter, Alexander Fink, Peter T. Leeson, John A. Dove, Thomas L. Hogan, Alexander Fink and Paul Grey. Their work appears in journals such as The Review of Austrian Economics, Public Choice, Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Journal of Sport Management and Constitutional Political Economy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact