Daniel J. Scanderbeg

35 papers receiving 709 citations

Peers

Daniel J. Scanderbeg
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 174
  • Radiation 194
  • Cancer Research 109
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 135
  • Oncology 125
Replace Daphne D. D. Rietbergen with:
Daphne D. D. Rietbergen Netherlands
Joseph F. Montebello United States
Lanchun Lu United States
Masanori Someya Japan
Melania Pintilie Canada
Tord Hompland Norway
Gaber Komar Finland
Horst Jürgen Feldmann Germany
Christine Ellingsen Norway
Yoko Harima Japan
Daniel J. Scanderbeg relative to Daphne D. D. Rietbergen Netherlands Daphne D. D. Rietbergen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Daphne D. D. Rietbergen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel J. Scanderbeg

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel J. Scanderbeg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel J. Scanderbeg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel J. Scanderbeg more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel J. Scanderbeg

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel J. Scanderbeg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel J. Scanderbeg. The network helps show where Daniel J. Scanderbeg may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel J. Scanderbeg, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel J. Scanderbeg Line = papers co-authored together Daniel J. Scanderbeg links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201175
2 201571
3 201964
4 201247
5 200847
6 202246
7 201541
8 201439
9 202036
10 201634
11 201327
12 201925
13 200923
14 201622
15 202221
16 200320
17 202313
18 20168
19 20237
20 20236

About Daniel J. Scanderbeg

Daniel J. Scanderbeg is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Radiation, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cancer Research and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 38 papers that have together received 718 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques (13 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (10 papers), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (7 papers), Radiation Dose and Imaging (6 papers), Advances in Oncology and Radiotherapy (4 papers), Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry (2 papers), Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology (2 papers) and Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (174 citations), Radiation (194 citations), Cancer Research (109 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (135 citations) and Oncology (125 citations). Daniel J. Scanderbeg has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Catheryn M. Yashar, R Rice, Cheryl Saenz, Todd Pawlicki, Sunil J. Advani, Sameer K. Nath, Jyoti Mayadev, Dae Yup Han, William Y. Song and Arno J. Mundt. Their work appears in journals such as Brachytherapy, International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, Medical dosimetry and Radiotherapy and Oncology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact