Daniel J. Rees

17 papers receiving 579 citations

Peers

Daniel J. Rees
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • Aging 25
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 84
  • Developmental Neuroscience 38
  • Information Systems and Management 87
  • Drug Discovery 2
Replace Yijing Wang with:
Yijing Wang China
Zhiwei Liu China
Miao Zhao China
Seong Eun Cho South Korea
Hyun‐Hee Park South Korea
Jimmy Kim Japan
Satoko Suzuki Japan
Seo Yeon Lee South Korea
Alessandra Sayuri Kikuchi Tamajusuku Brazil
Daniel J. Rees relative to Yijing Wang China Yijing Wang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×12×
Yijing Wang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel J. Rees

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel J. Rees's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel J. Rees with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel J. Rees more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel J. Rees

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel J. Rees. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel J. Rees. The network helps show where Daniel J. Rees may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel J. Rees, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel J. Rees Line = papers co-authored together Daniel J. Rees links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 2016144
2 2018143
3 201593
4 201845
5 202233
6 201732
7 201722
8 201619
9 201915
10 20228
11 20187
12 20207
13 20226
14
Dealing with Covid-19: understanding the policy choices
20205
15 20205
16 20234
17 20253
18 20250
19 20250

About Daniel J. Rees

Daniel J. Rees is a scholar working on Information Systems and Management, Neurology, Health Informatics, Developmental Neuroscience and Management of Technology and Innovation, having authored 19 papers that have together received 591 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (4 papers), Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (4 papers), Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education (2 papers), Digital Marketing and Social Media (2 papers), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (2 papers), University-Industry-Government Innovation Models (2 papers), Health Services Management and Policy (1 paper) and Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Aging (25 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (84 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (38 citations), Information Systems and Management (87 citations) and Drug Discovery (2 citations). Daniel J. Rees has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Jeffrey S. Davies, Zane Bruce Andrews, Nripendra Pratap Rana, Sian Roderick, Abdullah Mohammed Baabdullah, Bruce E. Kemp, Moyra B. Lemus, Aiysha Thompson, Romana Stark and Sandra Galić. Their work appears in journals such as Neuropharmacology, Journal of Controlled Release, International Journal of Information Management, Journal of Molecular Neuroscience and Current Protocols in Neuroscience.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact