Daniel J. Larkin

5.2k citations
80 papers · 1.8k · h-index 25

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel J. Larkin

76 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers

Daniel J. Larkin
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 844
  • Ecological Modeling 186
  • Ecology 831
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 618
  • Insect Science 273
Replace Valentin H. Klaus with:
Valentin H. Klaus Switzerland
Emmanuel Corcket France
Jes Hines Germany
Till Eggers Germany
Lorna J. Cole United Kingdom
Markus Bernhardt‐Römermann Germany
Pedro Martins da Silva Portugal
Thomas Bolger Ireland
Yunhui Liu China
Simone Cesarz Germany
Daniel J. Larkin relative to Valentin H. Klaus Switzerland Valentin H. Klaus's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Valentin H. Klaus · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel J. Larkin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel J. Larkin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel J. Larkin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel J. Larkin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel J. Larkin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel J. Larkin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel J. Larkin. The network helps show where Daniel J. Larkin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel J. Larkin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel J. Larkin Line = papers co-authored together Daniel J. Larkin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 80 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011233
2 201799
3 200995
4 201192
5 201169
6
Fate and effects of diazinon.
200068
7 201762
8 201556
9 201154
10 201847
11 201844
12 202041
13 201641
14 200841
15 201540
16 201337
17 201537
18 201837
19 201635
20 201433

About Daniel J. Larkin

Daniel J. Larkin is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Plant Science and Ecological Modeling, having authored 80 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (44 papers), Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics (23 papers), Plant and animal studies (19 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (13 papers), Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology (12 papers), Rangeland and Wildlife Management (11 papers), Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics (8 papers) and Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (844 citations), Ecological Modeling (186 citations), Ecology (831 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (618 citations) and Insect Science (273 citations). Daniel J. Larkin has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Jeremie B. Fant, Nancy C. Tuchman, John S. Ascher, Rebecca K. Tonietto, Pamela Geddes, Shane C. Lishawa, Andrew L. Hipp, Rebecca S. Barak, Ranjan Muthukrishnan and Ronald S. Tjeerdema. Their work appears in journals such as Aquatic Botany, Journal of Applied Ecology, Journal of Ecology, Ecology and Evolution and Restoration Ecology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact