Daniel J. Hocking

1.3k citations
34 papers · 1k · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel J. Hocking

34 papers receiving 1k citations

Peers

Daniel J. Hocking
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
  • Global and Planetary Change 634
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 185
  • Ecological Modeling 41
  • Ecology 182
  • Insect Science 37
Replace Brenda C. McComb with:
Brenda C. McComb United States
Andrew M. Ray United States
Elizabeth B. Harper United States
David A. Boughton United States
Heather L. Bateman United States
Mauricio Almeida‐Gomes Brazil
Eric R. Buhle United States
Anik Brind’Amour France
Andrew J. Allstadt United States
Laura A. Brandt United States
Daniel J. Hocking relative to Brenda C. McComb United States Brenda C. McComb's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Brenda C. McComb · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel J. Hocking

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel J. Hocking's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel J. Hocking with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel J. Hocking more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel J. Hocking

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel J. Hocking. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel J. Hocking. The network helps show where Daniel J. Hocking may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel J. Hocking, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel J. Hocking Line = papers co-authored together Daniel J. Hocking links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009182
2
Amphibian Contributions to Ecosystem Services
2014170
3 200889
4 201681
5 201558
6 200854
7 200745
8 201235
9 201433
10 200932
11 201727
12 201926
13 201624
14 201322
15 201621
16 200818
17 201817
18 201916
19 202015
20 202013

About Daniel J. Hocking

Daniel J. Hocking is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology, Geology and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, having authored 34 papers that have together received 1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Amphibian and Reptile Biology (24 papers), Fish Ecology and Management Studies (4 papers), Land Use and Ecosystem Services (2 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (2 papers), Ecology and biodiversity studies (2 papers), Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (2 papers), scientometrics and bibliometrics research (1 paper) and Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Global and Planetary Change (634 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (185 citations), Ecological Modeling (41 citations), Ecology (182 citations) and Insect Science (37 citations). Daniel J. Hocking has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Kimberly J. Babbitt, Raymond D. Semlitsch, Tracy A. G. Rittenhouse, Elizabeth B. Harper, Benjamin H. Letcher, Betsie B. Rothermel, William Earl Peterman, Keith H. Nislow, Malcolm L. Hunter and James P. Gibbs. Their work appears in journals such as Biological Conservation, Forest Ecology and Management, Oecologia, Ecological Applications and Biology Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact