Daniel J. Cho

16 papers receiving 565 citations

Peers

Daniel J. Cho
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 236
  • Internal Medicine 16
  • Physiology 114
  • Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes 29
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 81
Replace Mehmet Üyüklü with:
Mehmet Üyüklü Türkiye
Miklós Rábai Hungary
C. Pfafferott Germany
Sang-Joon Lee South Korea
Yunhee Ku South Korea
SP Sutera United States
R.R. Puniyani India
Fengwu Chen China
Tamar Mardi Israel
Antoinette V. Buys South Africa
Daniel J. Cho relative to Mehmet Üyüklü Türkiye Mehmet Üyüklü's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.2×
Mehmet Üyüklü · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel J. Cho

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel J. Cho's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel J. Cho with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel J. Cho more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel J. Cho

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel J. Cho. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel J. Cho. The network helps show where Daniel J. Cho may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel J. Cho, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel J. Cho Line = papers co-authored together Daniel J. Cho links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 2008191
2 201194
3 201274
4 201462
5 201340
6 201631
7 201921
8 202216
9 202212
10 201112
11 201810
12 20198
13 20128
14 20224
15 20233
16 20251
17 20130

About Daniel J. Cho

Daniel J. Cho is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Physiology and Nephrology, having authored 17 papers that have together received 587 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Blood properties and coagulation (9 papers), Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics (3 papers), Peripheral Artery Disease Management (3 papers), Lipid metabolism and disorders (3 papers), Erythrocyte Function and Pathophysiology (2 papers), Microbial Inactivation Methods (1 paper), Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides (1 paper) and Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (236 citations), Internal Medicine (16 citations), Physiology (114 citations), Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (29 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (81 citations). Daniel J. Cho has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Korea and China. Frequent co-authors include Young I. Cho, Robert S. Rosenson, Young Il Cho, Qinzhong Chen, Alexander Fridman, Alexander Rabinovich, Dong Hoon Lee, Keun‐Hwa Jung, Gregory Fridman and John St. Cyr. Their work appears in journals such as Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy, International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer, Review of Scientific Instruments, Cardiovascular Diabetology and Current Atherosclerosis Reports.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact