Daniel Heartz
Impact in
Papers in
- Music 35
- Musicology and Musical Analysis 31
- Diverse Musicological Studies 12
- Theater, Performance, and Music History 6
- Music History and Culture 4
-
- Historical and Literary Studies 6
- Co-authors
- Robert N. Freeman (1 shared paper)Bonnie C. Wade (2 shared papers)James Porter (1 shared paper)Thomas Bauman (1 shared paper)Mary Hunter (1 shared paper)Patrick Karl O’Brien (1 shared paper)Thomas W. Baumann (1 shared paper)Alec Hyatt King (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of the American Musicological Society (9 papers)Notes (5 papers)Early Music (5 papers)Journal of Musicology (3 papers)Eighteenth-Century Studies (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Daniel Heartz
37 papers receiving 164 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
- Music 256
- Classics 63
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts 29
- Museology 20
- Literature and Literary Theory 55
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Heartz
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Heartz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Heartz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Heartz more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Heartz
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Heartz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Heartz. The network helps show where Daniel Heartz may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 8 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Heartz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 62 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Music in European Capitals: The Galant Style, 1720-1780 | 2003 | 95 |
| 2 | 1997 | 41 | |
| 3 | 1967 | 29 | |
| 4 | 1985 | 26 | |
| 5 | 1978 | 26 | |
| 6 | 1971 | 22 | |
| 7 | 1991 | 13 | |
| 8 | Mozart, Haydn and Early Beethoven: 1781–1802 | 2008 | 12 |
| 9 | Report of the twelfth congress, Berkeley 1977 | 1981 | 11 |
| 10 | 1970 | 11 | |
| 11 | 1973 | 10 | |
| 12 | 1987 | 7 | |
| 13 | 1977 | 6 | |
| 14 | 1981 | 6 | |
| 15 | 1971 | 6 | |
| 16 | Mozart's Operas | 1990 | 6 |
| 17 | 1974 | 5 | |
| 18 | 1961 | 5 | |
| 19 | 1974 | 4 | |
| 20 | 1978 | 4 |
About Daniel Heartz
Daniel Heartz is a scholar working on Music, Anthropology, Political Science and International Relations, Literature and Literary Theory and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 62 papers that have together received 398 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Musicology and Musical Analysis (31 papers), Diverse Musicological Studies (12 papers), Historical and Literary Studies (6 papers), Theater, Performance, and Music History (6 papers), Historical Influence and Diplomacy (6 papers), Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (4 papers), Music History and Culture (4 papers) and Historical and Literary Analyses (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Music (256 citations), Classics (63 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (29 citations), Museology (20 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (55 citations). Daniel Heartz has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Robert N. Freeman, Bonnie C. Wade, James Porter, Thomas Bauman, Mary Hunter, Patrick Karl O’Brien, Thomas W. Baumann and Alec Hyatt King. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Musicological Society, Notes, Early Music, Journal of Musicology and Eighteenth-Century Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.