Daniel Harley

633 citations
24 papers · 406 · h-index 10

Impact in

    • Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
    • Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
    • Interactive and Immersive Displays
  • Museology top 5%
    • Museums and Cultural Heritage

Papers in

Daniel Harley

22 papers receiving 396 citations

Peers

Daniel Harley
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Human-Computer Interaction 313
  • Museology 28
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 98
  • Sensory Systems 19
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 69
Replace Oğuz Buruk with:
Oğuz Buruk Finland
Adrian Hazzard United Kingdom
Jinsil Hwaryoung Seo United States
Maxine Glancy United Kingdom
Zillah Watson United Kingdom
Patrick Brundell United Kingdom
Elena Dzardanova Greece
Doenja Oogjes Netherlands
Anabela Marto Portugal
Sandra Poeschl Germany
Daniel Harley relative to Oğuz Buruk Finland Oğuz Buruk's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.8×
Oğuz Buruk · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Harley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Harley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Harley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Harley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Harley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Harley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Harley. The network helps show where Daniel Harley may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Harley, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Harley Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Harley links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201862
2 202158
3 201650
4 201745
5 201536
6 201933
7 202230
8 201625
9 201613
10 202410
11 20228
12 20247
13 20226
14 20195
15 20234
16 20243
17 20213
18 20202
19 20202
20 20232

About Daniel Harley

Daniel Harley is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Sociology and Political Science, Cognitive Neuroscience, Museology and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, having authored 24 papers that have together received 406 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (13 papers), Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (12 papers), Interactive and Immersive Displays (7 papers), Digital Games and Media (5 papers), Museums and Cultural Heritage (3 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (3 papers), Cinema and Media Studies (2 papers) and Gender, Feminism, and Media (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (313 citations), Museology (28 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (98 citations), Sensory Systems (19 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (69 citations). Daniel Harley has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Ali Mazalek, Mark Hancock, Lennart E. Nacke, Reza Hadi Mogavi, R. Woo, James R. Wallace and Ville Mäkelä. Their work appears in journals such as Convergence The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, New Media & Society, Music Educators Journal, Designing Interactive Systems Conference and Frontiers in Virtual Reality.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact