Daniel Hammett

1.4k citations
57 papers · 902 · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Hammett

55 papers receiving 813 citations

Peers

Daniel Hammett
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Urban Studies 104
  • Geography, Planning and Development 68
  • Sociology and Political Science 536
  • Development 35
  • Gender Studies 68
Replace Ann M. Oberhauser with:
Ann M. Oberhauser United States
Sara C. Motta Australia
Thomas B. Osborne United States
Sārī Ḥanafī Lebanon
Laurence Cox Ireland
Barbara Cruikshank United States
Håkan Thörn Sweden
Patricia Daley United Kingdom
Fernando J. Bosco United States
Marjorie Mayo United Kingdom
Daniel Hammett relative to Ann M. Oberhauser United States Ann M. Oberhauser's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Ann M. Oberhauser · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Hammett

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Hammett's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Hammett with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Hammett more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Hammett

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Hammett. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Hammett. The network helps show where Daniel Hammett may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Hammett, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Hammett Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Hammett links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 57 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201069
2 201657
3 201257
4 201037
5 200737
6 201034
7 201333
8 201332
9 201231
10 200829
11 201226
12 201026
13 200922
14 201022
15 201021
16 201121
17 202020
18 201320
19 200719
20 200719

About Daniel Hammett

Daniel Hammett is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Education, Political Science and International Relations, Geography, Planning and Development and Urban Studies, having authored 57 papers that have together received 902 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include International Development and Aid (6 papers), Global Education and Multiculturalism (6 papers), Historical Geography and Geographical Thought (6 papers), Global Educational Policies and Reforms (5 papers), Rural development and sustainability (4 papers), Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics (4 papers), Multilingual Education and Policy (4 papers) and Diverse Aspects of Tourism Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Urban Studies (104 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (68 citations), Sociology and Political Science (536 citations), Development (35 citations) and Gender Studies (68 citations). Daniel Hammett has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, South Africa and United States. Frequent co-authors include Lynn A. Staeheli, Jean Grugel, Thomas Molony, Niamh Shortt, Deborah Sporton, Lucy Jackson, Gijsbert Hoogendoorn, Charles Mather, Paul Nugent and Sara Rich Dorman. Their work appears in journals such as Political Geography, Area, International Development Planning Review, Geography and Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact