Daniel Hack

21 papers receiving 128 citations

Peers

Daniel Hack
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 12
  • Molecular Medicine 29
  • Literature and Literary Theory 61
  • History 42
  • History and Philosophy of Science 11
Replace David Stricklin with:
David Stricklin United States
Kathryn R. King United States
Tamara S. Wagner Singapore
Alannah Tomkins United Kingdom
Victoria Burke United States
Susan L. Burns United States
Tina Lu United States
Mark Holloway Germany
Sally Humphreys United Kingdom
Mirjam van Veen Netherlands
Daniel Hack relative to David Stricklin United States David Stricklin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×12.2×
David Stricklin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Hack

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Hack's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Hack with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Hack more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Hack

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Hack. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Hack. The network helps show where Daniel Hack may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Hack, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Hack Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Hack links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202333
2
The Material Interests of the Victorian Novel
200523
3 199923
4 200819
5 202218
6 201612
7 201211
8 20207
9 19997
10 20206
11 19966
12 20203
13 20203
14 20232
15 20052
16 20091
17 20231
18 20191
19 20201
20 19991

About Daniel Hack

Daniel Hack is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Infectious Diseases, Sociology and Political Science, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Molecular Medicine, having authored 28 papers that have together received 182 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Infection Control and Ventilation (4 papers), Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria (3 papers), Postcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies (3 papers), Antibiotic Use and Resistance (3 papers), Contemporary Literature and Criticism (3 papers), American and British Literature Analysis (2 papers), Irish and British Studies (2 papers) and Literature: history, themes, analysis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (12 citations), Molecular Medicine (29 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (61 citations), History (42 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (11 citations). Daniel Hack has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Albania. Frequent co-authors include Volkhard A. J. Kempf, Michael Hogardt, Silke Besier, Tilman Schultze, Thomas A. Wichelhaus, Ulrich Rochwalsky, Claudia Reinheimer, Sabine Wicker, Jürgen Graf and Timo Stöver. Their work appears in journals such as Victorian Studies, NOVEL A Forum on Fiction, Studies in English Literature 1500-1900, Der Ophthalmologe and Eurosurveillance.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact