Daniel Güllmar

2.0k citations
72 papers · 1.6k · h-index 22

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Güllmar

66 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

Daniel Güllmar
Comparison fields: 5 of 128
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 673
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 541
  • Neurology 110
  • Computational Mathematics 7
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 144
Replace Can Ceritoglu with:
Can Ceritoglu United States
Anil Rao United Kingdom
George Papadimitriou United States
Birkan Tunç United States
Vitria Adisetiyo United States
Alain Pitiot United Kingdom
Salima Makni France
Sudhir Pathak United States
Maximilian Pietsch United Kingdom
Daniel Güllmar relative to Can Ceritoglu United States Can Ceritoglu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Can Ceritoglu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Güllmar

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Güllmar's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Güllmar with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Güllmar more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Güllmar

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Güllmar. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Güllmar. The network helps show where Daniel Güllmar may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Güllmar, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Güllmar Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Güllmar links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 72 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010161
2 2006139
3 200998
4 201381
5 201479
6 201572
7 201062
8 201356
9 200647
10 200944
11 201142
12 200542
13 201339
14 201439
15 200538
16 202033
17 201133
18 201132
19 201326
20 201126

About Daniel Güllmar

Daniel Güllmar is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Cognitive Neuroscience, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Psychiatry and Mental health and Neurology, having authored 72 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (31 papers), Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (24 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (19 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (5 papers), MRI in cancer diagnosis (4 papers), Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders (4 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (4 papers) and Blind Source Separation Techniques (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (673 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (541 citations), Neurology (110 citations), Computational Mathematics (7 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (144 citations). Daniel Güllmar has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Jürgen R. Reichenbach, Jens Haueisen, Gerd Wagner, Kathrin Koch, Ralf G.M. Schlösser, C. Christoph Schultz, Heinrich Sauer, Claudia Schachtzabel, Igor Nenadić and Hans‐Joachim Mentzel. Their work appears in journals such as Zeitschrift für Medizinische Physik, NeuroImage, Frontiers in Neuroscience, European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience and Brain Topography.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact