Daniel Gilling

531 citations
22 papers · 319 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Gilling

19 papers receiving 272 citations

Peers

Daniel Gilling
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
  • Public Administration 27
  • Sociology and Political Science 256
  • Political Science and International Relations 128
  • General Health Professions 111
  • Health 24
Replace Cecilia Hansen Löfstrand with:
Cecilia Hansen Löfstrand Sweden
Heather Ann Thompson United States
Trevor Jones United Kingdom
Monica C. Bell United States
Dina Hummelsheim Germany
Shelley A. M. Gavigan Canada
Bill Dixon United Kingdom
Victor George United Kingdom
Robert Vargas United States
Willem de Lint Canada
Daniel Gilling relative to Cecilia Hansen Löfstrand Sweden Cecilia Hansen Löfstrand's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Cecilia Hansen Löfstrand · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Gilling

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Gilling's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Gilling with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Gilling more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Gilling

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Gilling. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Gilling. The network helps show where Daniel Gilling may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 3 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Gilling, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Gilling Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Gilling links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199955
2 199749
3
Crime Prevention: Theory, Policy And Practice
199743
4 200139
5 200429
6
Crime Reduction and Community Safety: Labour and the Politics of Local Crime Control
200723
7 199417
8 201311
9 20139
10 20138
11 19987
12 20057
13 20135
14 20164
15 20024
16 20083
17 20053
18
A Case Study of an English Community Court
20121
19 20001
20 19991

About Daniel Gilling

Daniel Gilling is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology and Law, having authored 22 papers that have together received 319 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Crime Patterns and Interventions (13 papers), Policing Practices and Perceptions (10 papers), Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance (5 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (5 papers), Crime, Deviance, and Social Control (5 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (2 papers), Legal Education and Practice Innovations (1 paper) and Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (27 citations), Sociology and Political Science (256 citations), Political Science and International Relations (128 citations), General Health Professions (111 citations) and Health (24 citations). Daniel Gilling has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Adrian Barton, Gordon Hughes and Adam Edwards. Their work appears in journals such as Crime Prevention and Community Safety, Critical Social Policy, European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice and Policing & Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact