Daniel Gilks

730 citations
20 papers · 595 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Gilks

20 papers receiving 586 citations

Peers

Daniel Gilks
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 351
  • Materials Chemistry 440
  • Condensed Matter Physics 110
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 166
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment 71
Replace Zhaocong Huang with:
Zhaocong Huang China
Hideto Yanagihara Japan
G.H. Zheng China
Xiaokun Wen China
E. P. Sajitha India
Y. Fu China
Frank Stromberg Germany
Michał Matczak Poland
Jun Du China
Oksana V. Koplak Russia
Daniel Gilks relative to Zhaocong Huang China Zhaocong Huang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Zhaocong Huang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Gilks

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Gilks's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Gilks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Gilks more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Gilks

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Gilks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Gilks. The network helps show where Daniel Gilks may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Gilks, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Gilks Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Gilks links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 2014221
2 2014126
3 201469
4 201225
5 201321
6 201618
7 201318
8 201314
9 201413
10 201613
11 202311
12 20149
13 20158
14 20147
15 20147
16 20175
17 20144
18 20143
19 20152
20 20161

About Daniel Gilks

Daniel Gilks is a scholar working on Materials Chemistry, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment and Mechanical Engineering, having authored 20 papers that have together received 595 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetic Properties and Synthesis of Ferrites (9 papers), Magnetic properties of thin films (6 papers), Iron oxide chemistry and applications (5 papers), Graphene research and applications (4 papers), 2D Materials and Applications (3 papers), Multiferroics and related materials (3 papers), Topological Materials and Phenomena (3 papers) and Heusler alloys: electronic and magnetic properties (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (351 citations), Materials Chemistry (440 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (110 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (166 citations) and Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (71 citations). Daniel Gilks has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Japan and United States. Frequent co-authors include Vlado K. Lazarov, Leonardo Lari, M. Weinert, L. Li, Yang Liu, Yaoyi Li, Pedro L. Galindo, S. Rajput, Keith Patrick McKenna and Florian Hofer. Their work appears in journals such as Microscopy and Microanalysis, Journal of Applied Physics, Scientific Reports, Physical Review B and Materials.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact