Daniel Geisler

3.2k citations
73 papers · 2.3k · h-index 28

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Geisler

71 papers receiving 2.2k citations

Peers

Daniel Geisler
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
  • Clinical Psychology 1.1k
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 623
  • Applied Psychology 162
  • Biological Psychiatry 55
  • Oncology 558
Replace Michiel B. de Ruiter with:
Michiel B. de Ruiter Netherlands
Andreas Frick Sweden
José Luís Carrasco Spain
Caroline Crombie United Kingdom
Juho Joutsa Finland
Sien Hu United States
Malene Flensborg Damholdt Denmark
Herta H. Chao United States
Alina Borkowska Poland
Hanna M. Ollila Finland
Daniel Geisler relative to Michiel B. de Ruiter Netherlands Michiel B. de Ruiter's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Michiel B. de Ruiter · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Geisler

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Geisler's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Geisler with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Geisler more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Geisler

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Geisler. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Geisler. The network helps show where Daniel Geisler may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Geisler, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Geisler Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Geisler links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 73 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009285
2 2014127
3 2010110
4 2016104
5 201596
6 201490
7 200966
8 201562
9 201653
10 201852
11 201547
12 201846
13 201746
14 201344
15 200943
16 201543
17 201743
18 201642
19 201042
20 201540

About Daniel Geisler

Daniel Geisler is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Oncology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 73 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Eating Disorders and Behaviors (45 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (21 papers), Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (11 papers), Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (10 papers), Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (10 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (8 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (8 papers) and Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (1.1k citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (623 citations), Applied Psychology (162 citations), Biological Psychiatry (55 citations) and Oncology (558 citations). Daniel Geisler has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Stefan Ehrlich, Veit Roessner, Joseph A. King, Maria Seidel, Franziska Ritschel, Matthew F. Kalady, Fabio Bernardoni, Luca Stocchi, Ilka Boehm and Luiz Felipe de Campos‐Lobato. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience, Psychological Medicine, Translational Psychiatry, Scientific Reports and Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact