Daniel Geisler

3.3k citations
74 papers · 2.3k · h-index 29

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Geisler

71 papers receiving 2.3k citations

Peers

Daniel Geisler
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
  • Clinical Psychology 1.1k
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 420
  • Applied Psychology 102
  • Biological Psychiatry 47
  • Oncology 417
Replace Michiel B. de Ruiter with:
Michiel B. de Ruiter Netherlands
Xinhua Yang China
Caroline Crombie United Kingdom
Qilin Lu China
Malene Flensborg Damholdt Denmark
Sien Hu United States
Gaëlle E. Doucet United States
Hanna M. Ollila Finland
Herta H. Chao United States
Alina Borkowska Poland
Daniel Geisler relative to Michiel B. de Ruiter Netherlands Michiel B. de Ruiter's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Michiel B. de Ruiter · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Geisler

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Geisler's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Geisler with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Geisler more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Geisler

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Geisler. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Geisler. The network helps show where Daniel Geisler may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Geisler, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Geisler Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Geisler links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 74 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009285
2 2014127
3 2010110
4 2016107
5 201598
6 201492
7 200969
8 201565
9 201654
10 201852
11 201548
12 201747
13 201846
14 201345
15 201744
16 201543
17 201043
18 200943
19 201643
20 201543

About Daniel Geisler

Daniel Geisler is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Surgery and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 74 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Eating Disorders and Behaviors (42 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (11 papers), Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (7 papers), Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (6 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (5 papers), Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (4 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (3 papers) and Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (1.1k citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (420 citations), Applied Psychology (102 citations), Biological Psychiatry (47 citations) and Oncology (417 citations). Daniel Geisler has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Stefan Ehrlich, Veit Roessner, Joseph A. King, Maria Seidel, Franziska Ritschel, Fabio Bernardoni, Matthew F. Kalady, Ilka Boehm, Luca Stocchi and Luiz Felipe de Campos‐Lobato. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience, Translational Psychiatry, Psychological Medicine, Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry and Surgical Endoscopy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact