Daniel Frobish

878 citations
13 papers · 685 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Frobish

11 papers receiving 652 citations

Peers

Daniel Frobish
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 420
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 204
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 91
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 52
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 56
Replace G. R. Wright with:
G. R. Wright Canada
Torstein Engelskjøn Norway
Anna Kozłowska Poland
Ivan Tůma Czechia
Hongjuan Sun China
Rebecca Martin United States
Katrin Schweizer Switzerland
Olivia C. Eller United States
Angela Laganà Italy
Beate Wenzel Germany
Daniel Frobish relative to G. R. Wright Canada G. R. Wright's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
G. R. Wright · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Frobish

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Frobish's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Frobish with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Frobish more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Frobish

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Frobish. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Frobish. The network helps show where Daniel Frobish may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Frobish, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Frobish Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Frobish links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 2003188
2 2012159
3 2005107
4 200486
5 200464
6 200535
7 201317
8 201114
9 200811
10 20143
11 20251
12 20240
13 20240

About Daniel Frobish

Daniel Frobish is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Statistics and Probability, Molecular Biology and Ecology, having authored 13 papers that have together received 685 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epilepsy research and treatment (5 papers), Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies (2 papers), Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference (2 papers), Neonatal and fetal brain pathology (2 papers), Statistical Methods and Inference (2 papers), Seed Germination and Physiology (1 paper), Child Nutrition and Water Access (1 paper) and Vibrio bacteria research studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (420 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (204 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (91 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (52 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (56 citations). Daniel Frobish has collaborated with scholars based in United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Shlomo Shinnar, Anne T. Berg, James N. McNair, Anusha Sunkara, Francine M. Testa, Barbara Beckerman, Susan R. Levy, Carl W. Bazil, Nader Ebrahimi and S. V. Pacia. Their work appears in journals such as Neurology, Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, Seed Science Research, Water and PEDIATRICS.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact