Daniel Friedman

30 papers receiving 526 citations

Peers

Daniel Friedman
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
  • General Decision Sciences 23
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 169
  • Genetics 198
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 128
  • Insect Science 77
Replace J. E. R. Staddon with:
J. E. R. Staddon United States
Kate V. Morgan United Kingdom
Christopher L. Buckley United Kingdom
Chrisantha Fernando United Kingdom
Brian H. Sumida United Kingdom
Arend Hintze United States
Steven Hamblin Australia
Rachel N. Denison United States
Erkan O. Buzbas United States
Benjamin A. Knott United States
Daniel Friedman relative to J. E. R. Staddon United States J. E. R. Staddon's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×20×40×55×
J. E. R. Staddon · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Friedman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Friedman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Friedman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Friedman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Friedman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Friedman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Friedman. The network helps show where Daniel Friedman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Friedman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Friedman Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Friedman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1990164
2 201467
3 198342
4 201833
5 201628
6 201925
7 201625
8 202020
9 202118
10 202317
11 202016
12 201214
13 202313
14 201913
15 20189
16 19907
17 20077
18 20166
19 20234
20 20153

About Daniel Friedman

Daniel Friedman is a scholar working on Genetics, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Sociology and Political Science, Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 32 papers that have together received 545 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (11 papers), Plant and animal studies (8 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (5 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (4 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (3 papers), Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (3 papers), Complex Systems and Decision Making (2 papers) and Radio Frequency Integrated Circuit Design (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (23 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (169 citations), Genetics (198 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (128 citations) and Insect Science (77 citations). Daniel Friedman has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Dominic W. Massaro, Deborah M. Gordon, Timothy A. Linksvayer, Brian R. Johnson, Michael Greene, Joel Atallah, Joanna C. Chiu, Karl Friston, Eirik Søvik and Axel Constant. Their work appears in journals such as Psychological Review, Physics of Life Reviews, Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, Scientific Reports and Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact